My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
110723 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2023 1:58:17 PM
Creation date
11/6/2023 2:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jocelyn Kwong <br /> From: Gerry Beaudin <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 12:43 PM <br /> Cc: Pamela Ott; Norm Dorais; Tamara Baptista; Dan Sodergren; Jocelyn Kwong <br /> Subject: RE: Very High Water Use - Rate Comparison with Livermore (Jan 1 2024 w/ Proposed <br /> Rate) <br /> Importance: High <br /> CORRECTION—INCORRECT CALCULATION. <br /> Good afternoon, Mayor and Councilmembers— <br /> The comparison I sent out earlier today is not correct. <br /> (We inadvertently used 90 units to start the calculation for Livermore and then realized Livermore is MONTHLY, so we <br /> doubled it... therefore, we should have reduced Livermore's chart to 45 units). <br /> Here is the updated chart...sorry we didn't catch this before it went to you. <br /> We would be a little more expensive than Livermore at the 90 CcF level ($654.97 in Pleasanton, compared to $621.90 in <br /> Livermore). <br /> Please let me know if you want to discuss this further, and apologies for the earlier error. <br /> Gerry <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.