My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
121923 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 6:21:19 PM
Creation date
12/18/2023 6:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 6 <br />Project Categorization <br />The WSMP is being developed with a list of anticipated projects within the following categories. <br />1. Water Supply – Water Supply requirements generally fall within two categories, <br />volumetric/available daily rates, and water quality. This includes the City’s recent action <br />to proceed with developing an alternative water supply to replace the City’s PFAS <br />contaminated sources (i.e., two new wells). <br />2. Distribution – Distribution system projects include system upgrades needed to improve <br />performance to meet current City standards based on the City’s updated distribution <br />hydraulic model. These projects mainly include pipeline replacement to address fire flow <br />and other system deficiencies. <br />3. Rehabilitation and Replacement (R&R) – Based on physical assessment of the water <br />system facilities condition, R&R projects fall into two categories, above ground facilities <br />such as pump station and water storage tanks and below ground which are primarily <br />pipelines renewal and replacement. There can be overlap between distribution <br />improvements pipeline R&R; for the purpose of this analysis, priority is given to <br />distribution pipeline needs. <br />4. Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) – The operations and <br />management of supply and distribution on an hourly basis is controlled and monitored <br />via the City’s SCADA system and the power supply to pumps and other equipment is <br />managed within city-owned facilities. Improvement recommendations were developed <br />based on a comprehensive study and involved input from City’s water O&M staff. <br /> <br />Project Prioritization <br />The Priority System ranks the level of importance of a project based on several factors, such <br />as protection of health and safety and rate of return on the City’s investment. Risk of failure <br />was assigned to each asset to help understand the criticality of the asset function to the overall <br />system viability. A risk score was calculated based on the probability and consequences of <br />failure scores, and the asset condition scoring is based on a 1-5 scale. Asset condition scores <br />were developed for mechanical, electrical, and structural categories. Each facility was scored <br />by asset type and assigned a reinvestment year. Consequences of failure score was <br />developed based on a matrix of factors. Distribution pipelines were also evaluated based on <br />the type of material, pipe age, criticality, and using available data and staff knowledge to the <br />extent available. <br /> <br />Recognizing that there are limitations in available funds and to ensure generational equity <br />(where future generations have a legitimate expectation of equitable access to water <br />resources) among paying customers, an additional layer of prioritizing was required to achieve <br />more levelized annual capital spending. Only priority level A and B projects are included as <br />funded amounts and are to be addressed within the City’s regular rate study process. To <br />accomplish this task, CIP project prioritization was based on three categories that give some <br />flexibility in the implementation timing of funded capital needs so as not to overburden <br />ratepayers in any single or series of years when feasible: <br /> <br />Priority Level A: These projects are ranked the highest if they are required for health and <br />safety; required by law, regulation, or contract; are under construction; and/or are funded by <br />applicants or outside funding sources. Examples of these types of projects include two new <br />wells (as the approved water supply alternative project) and projects that increase water <br />Page 236 of 270
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.