Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE 73 <br />Perception of Need and Funding <br />PERCEPTION OF NEED <br />At the organizational level, nonprofit executives <br />and staff noted the broader perception that Eastern <br />Alameda County is an affluent region with lower <br />human service needs. Consequently, they noted <br />significant resource gaps and funding challenges in <br />the Tri-Valley, resulting in a relative “resource desert” <br />compared to other cities within Alameda County. <br />This is reflected in the community data focused on <br />long wait lists or having to travel further for services <br />(as described in the Community Challenges Health <br />and Mental Health sections). This creates a need for <br />greater service navigation and care coordination. <br />Participants said that needs were often less <br />recognized, particularly within Dublin and Pleasanton, <br />as high pockets of poverty are often buried within <br />census tracts. Nonprofit participants expressed <br />frustration about Alameda County funding historically <br />not being allocated to the Tri-Valley because of <br />the median incomes and other metrics of overall <br />economic health in the cities. One participant in the <br />nonprofit focus group expressed frustration: <br />“There tends to be a disconnect between Alameda <br />County and East County; East County tends to not <br />get as much. It’s figuring out what we need when <br />we do this assessment, and being able to show <br />that…we have this struggle with enough food for <br />our seniors, we don’t have transportation, we <br />don’t have enough housing, we don’t have all <br />these things. It doesn’t matter how big or how <br />much money each of these cities has or what the <br />medium income is…if we still can’t take care of all <br />these people here.” <br />FUNDING <br />In addition to a need for more funding overall, <br />nonprofits identified a need for earmarked funding <br />for infrastructure (e.g., buildings and vehicles), <br />operating costs, marketing (to increase service <br />awareness), and providing staff with a living wage (as <br />a mechanism for retention). One nonprofit <br />participant said: <br />“No one wants to pay for capacity building. It’s not <br />that we don’t want to have capacity for training <br />or for a fair market salary, it’s because funders <br />won’t pay for those things. They will only pay for <br />programs, which of course, if we don’t have staff <br />or we don’t have properly trained staff, we don’t <br />have programs, but no one wants to address that <br />or acknowledge that. Everyone feels like someone <br />else is supposed to pay for that. For whatever <br />reason, people don’t understand that we have <br />infrastructure costs.” <br />In addition to the request for funding to support <br />operation costs, there’s a desire to overhaul each <br />city’s grantmaking process to be more efficient, <br />reduce organizations’ administrative burdens (e.g., <br />reporting), and to make the process feasible for <br />less-resourced organizations. Along these lines, one <br />interviewee asked: <br />“Who is receiving grants and who is not receiving <br />grants? Some organizations don’t have access to <br />people who write grants. They might not have the <br />capacity to write grants, they might not necessarily <br />understand the grant process. They might be <br />unable to make cogent arguments amenable to <br />being funded, so when they submit a grant it’s not <br />written to score high on the rubric.” <br />Some participants had a preference for a more <br />coordinated grant-making process to help with <br />duplication of services and in recognition of the <br />linked fates of the three cities. Some said that ideas <br />for coordination, such as forming new agencies <br />to mitigate inefficiencies within cities and funding <br />consolidation, were met with hesitation or concern <br />about loss of control. <br />Emergency Preparation: <br />Supplies and Infrastructure <br />The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the <br />unpreparedness of many nonprofit organizations in <br />the Tri-Valley to deliver human services during an <br />emergency. They said it’s imperative that the three <br />cities and nonprofit organizations within them be <br />nimble and responsive to emergent conditions. <br />Participants noted the possibility of another public <br />health emergency and the negative effects of <br />climate change as two reasons that service providers <br />would need to pivot quickly. The pandemic showed <br />nonprofits just how challenging this is, as they had <br />tight budgets with no room to quickly purchase <br />EASTERN ALAMEDA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES NEEDS ASSESSMENTSS Page 131 of 554