My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
020624 REGULAR
>
AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2024 9:38:50 AM
Creation date
2/6/2024 9:33:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/6/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
554
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PAGE 80 <br />Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton might streamline <br />and/or coordinate their funding processes, wherever <br />possible. There are a number of possible revisions to <br />the funding process including: having longer durations <br />of funding, providing funding for capacity building, <br />simplifying application and reporting requirements, <br />establishing a minimum grant award, and/or <br />developing multi-year service contracts for core <br />service providers to meet identified needs. <br />Each city could support the identification of <br />alternative funding sources and help leverage <br />outside funds. Regional funding strategies should <br />also be considered to allow cities to leverage funds <br />for infrastructure, and ensure that services are not <br />duplicative. Additionally, there are a number of <br />possible revisions to existing funding streams that <br />might be considered. For example, councils might <br />consider general fund money, or different revenue <br />measures to support nonprofits. Consideration <br />might also be given to a revenue measure to work <br />regionally. Finally, a regional awarding body could be <br />established to serve the three cities. <br />Regardless of funding processes or streams, a <br />strategic approach must be taken to ensure the <br />region is collaboratively moving toward addressing <br />root causes of inequities. For example, North <br />Star questions could be used to ensure projects <br />are collaborative, considering both upstream and <br />downstream systemic factors, and encouraging <br />community engagement. <br />Actionable Recommendation 4: <br />Build Pipelines for a Diverse Workforce <br />Community members and nonprofit organizations <br />alike identified the need for racially, culturally, and <br />linguistically responsive providers. The provider types <br />most often mentioned included health care workers <br />such as dental and mental health providers and <br />service navigators. There is a need to not only attract <br />and retain a diverse workforce, but to also build <br />one. One approach is to build a pipeline program <br />in collaboration with local high schools. This could <br />attract people who already speak a second language. <br />For those who are English-speaking only, classes in <br />some of the region’s most common languages could <br />be provided. Students could get training and <br />internships that prepare them for service provider <br />positions (thus also meeting the need for affordable <br />non-sports extracurricular enrichment activities). <br />Additionally, partnerships could be formed with <br />a number of entities to build a workforce that <br />has the knowledge and skills to serve the diverse <br />residents of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton. This <br />could include engagement and support of regional <br />occupational programs, trade schools, training <br />centers, certificate programs, and local colleges and <br />universities. For example, building a relationship with <br />Las Positas College, which hosts the Tri-Valley Career <br />Center, could help identify steps to move this <br />recommendation forward. Finally, as housing remains <br />a significant challenge for service providers, we <br />recommend that the feasibility of constructing <br />dedicated housing units for essential workers be <br />explored. <br />Actionable Recommendation 5: <br />Consider Multi-Sector Service <br />and Infrastructure Solutions <br />As has been highlighted across the entirety of this <br />report, no single challenge identified through this <br />process exists outside structural factors, nor are <br />they separate from one another. Rather the most <br />intractable challenges that the region faces are <br />deeply intertwined. One service provider reflected <br />on how individuals most at risk experience multiple <br />compounding challenges: “I work with a population <br />that uses the ER for primary care; mostly patients who <br />have substance use disorders, serious mental illness, <br />and chronic conditions.” <br />Across the findings, three primary challenges <br />surfaced, often in relationship to each other: 1) <br />housing; 2) substance use; and 3) mental health. <br />This finding is substantiated by the 2022 Tri-Valley <br />PIT Count, which found that substance use (19%) <br />and mental health (18%) were among the top three <br />causes of being unhoused, and mental health services <br />at 30% was the top response for what might have <br />prevented becoming unhoused.13 <br />HOUSING <br />Housing was most often recommended as an <br />intervention that would have the greatest effect on <br />substance use and mental health, and more generally <br />to provide stability in the life of individuals and <br />EASTERN ALAMEDA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES NEEDS ASSESSMENTSS Page 138 of 554
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.