AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Tri-Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements xii Figure 12-10. Structures in Very High Landslide Susceptibility Zone, by Jurisdiction and Occupancy Class . 12-11 Figure 12-11. Critical Facilities in the High or Very High Landslide Susceptibility Zone ................................ 12-12 Figure 12-12. Loss Estimates for Landslide ....................................................................................................... 12-13 Figure 13-1. National Weather Service Heat Index.............................................................................................. 13-3 Figure 13-2. Space Weather Phenomena .............................................................................................................. 13-5 Figure 13-3. Annual Number of Heat Advisories in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties Since 2006 .............. 13-8 Figure 13-4. Wind Zones in the United States ..................................................................................................... 13-9 Figure 13-5. Loss Estimates for Severe Weather ............................................................................................... 13-11 Figure 14-1. Wildfire Hazard Severity Zones ...................................................................................................... 14-4 Figure 14-2. Population Exposed to Wildfire Hazard and Total Population, by Jurisdiction .............................. 14-6 Figure 14-3. Total Planning Area Population Exposed to Wildfire Hazard ......................................................... 14-6 Figure 14-4. Number and Exposed Value of Buildings in the Moderate FHSZ .................................................. 14-7 Figure 14-5. Number and Exposed Value of Buildings in the High FHSZ .......................................................... 14-7 Figure 14-6. Number and Exposed Value of Buildings in the Very High FHSZ ................................................. 14-8 Figure 14-7. Total Value in FHSZs as Percent of Total Replacement Value, by Jurisdiction ............................. 14-8 Figure 14-8. Structures in the Moderate FHSZ, by Jurisdiction and Occupancy Class ....................................... 14-9 Figure 14-9. Structures in the High FHSZ, by Jurisdiction and Occupancy Class ............................................... 14-9 Figure 14-10. Structures in the Very High FHSZ, by Jurisdiction and Occupancy Class .................................. 14-10 Figure 14-11. Critical Facilities in the High or Very High FHSZ ...................................................................... 14-11 Figure 14-12. Loss Estimates for Wildfire ......................................................................................................... 14-12 Figure 15-1. Global Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Over Time ........................................................................ 15-1 Figure 15-2. Observed and Projected Average Temperatures in Tri-Valley Planning Area ................................ 15-6 Figure 15-3. Projected Number of Extreme Heat Days by Year .......................................................................... 15-7 Figure 15-4. Projected Changes in Fire Risk, Relative to 2010 Levels ................................................................ 15-8 Figure 17-1. Example Pop-Up Message Indicating Ransomware Infection ........................................................ 17-7 Figure 17-2. Gas Transmission and Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Near the Planning Area ................................ 17-18 Figure 18-1. Probability Factors for Hazards of Concern .................................................................................... 18-2 Figure 18-2. Impact Factors for Hazards of Concern ........................................................................................... 18-3 Figure 18-3. Weighted Impact Factors for Hazards of Concern .......................................................................... 18-3 Figure 18-4. Total Risk Rating for Hazards of Concern ...................................................................................... 18-4 Figure 18-5. Hazard Risk Ranking ....................................................................................................................... 18-4 Page 77 of 228