My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AMENDED AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
06-12
>
AMENDED AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2024 10:58:18 AM
Creation date
6/17/2024 10:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2024-13 <br />Page Two <br /> <br /> <br />Section 2: Findings for PUD-18-07M <br /> <br />With respect to the Planned Unit Development application, PUD-18-07M, the Planning <br />Commission makes the following findings and determinations with respect to each of the <br />considerations for approval of a PUD Development Plan as required by Section 18.68.110 of the <br />Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC): <br /> <br /> <br />1. Whether the proposed development plan is in the best interest of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare. <br />The Planning Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, meets all <br />applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The project <br />will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City <br />streets and intersections in the area. The proposed addition will be designed to meet <br />the requirements of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, and other <br />applicable codes. As such, the Commission concludes this finding can be made. <br /> <br />2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton <br />General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br />The proposed development includes the subdivision of the approximately 4.41-acre <br />subject parcel into two lots measuring approximately 44,237 square feet (Lot 1) and <br />approximately 17,123 square feet (Lot 2). The Planning Commission finds the <br />proposed density conforms to the General Plan Low-Density Residential land use <br />designation which allows a maximum of two dwelling units per gross developable <br />acre. The resultant density with the proposed subdivision would be approximately <br />1.41 dwelling units/acre, which is within the maximum allowed density. The proposed <br />project promotes General Plan Programs and Policies encouraging new housing to be <br />developed on infill sites and encouraging the preservation of the existing housing <br />stock. As such, the Commission concludes that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the previously <br />developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the <br />site. <br />The proposed project is consistent with the neighborhood in that it maintains the <br />approximately 1-acre lot and farmhouse style of the existing residence. Any future <br />development of Lot 2 will conform to the PUD-18 Estate Lot standards, thus <br />maintaining the streetscape of Mohr Avenue. As such, the Commission finds that the <br />proposed addition to the residence on Lot 1 and the development standards for Lot 2 <br />are compatible with the land use pattern in the neighborhood and previously <br />developed properties in the vicinity. The subject lot is relatively flat with limited mature <br />existing vegetation, which will not be removed for the addition. As such, the Planning <br />Commission finds the residence is sensitive to the existing trees and vegetation on- <br />site. <br /> <br />4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan takes into <br />account environmental characteristics and is designed in keeping with the best
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.