My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 125 <br />Conclusion <br />With regards to Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the Consistency Checklist <br />demonstrates that: <br />1. No peculiar impacts related to the proposed project or its site that were <br />not analyzed as significant effects in the Housing Element Update FEIR <br />have been identified. <br />2. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts <br />which were not analyzed in the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an <br />impact which is more severe than anticipated by the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR. <br />4. No mitigation measures from the Housing Element Update FEIR would <br />be required because the proposed project’s specific impacts would be <br />less than significant. MM HAZ-2 has been satisfied, as described below. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measures <br />Housing Element Update FEIR Mitigation Measures <br />MM HAZ-2 Environmental Site Assessment <br />If a potential site for rezoning is suspected to contain hazardous <br />materials, prior to building permits, the City shall ensure that <br />each project applicant retain a qualified environmental <br />consulting firm to prepare a Phase I Environmental Site <br />Assessment (Phase I ESA) in accordance with the American <br />Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards in effect at <br />the time of request of issuance of grading or building permits, <br />whichever is sooner, which would ensure the City is aware of any <br />hazardous materials on-site. The Phase I ESA shall determine the <br />presence of recognized environmental conditions and state <br />whether further investigation is recommended (e.g., preparation <br />of a Phase II ESA, if applicable). Prior to receiving a certificate of <br />occupancy, project applicants shall provide documentation <br />from any overseeing agency (e.g., Alameda County <br />Environmental Health [ACEH], Department of Toxic Substances <br />Control [DTSC], or Regional Water Quality Control Board) to the <br />Community Development Department, Planning Division that <br />sites with identified contamination have been remediated to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.