My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET WORKSHOP
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
0507
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET WORKSHOP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 1:02:47 PM
Creation date
7/9/2024 1:02:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 of 19 <br /> <br />build inclusionary units on site may currently also propose payment of LIHF, or other <br />forms of alternative compliance. (See note above – alternative compliance will be the <br />subject of a future workshop). <br /> <br />A 2015 court case (California Building Industry Association vs. City of San Jose) <br />determined that inclusionary programs for residential developments, and associated in- <br />lieu fees are not subject to the same nexus study requirements as are required for <br />impact fees pursuant to AB 1600. However, California State law requires local agencies <br />to consider the financial impact of inclusionary programs and in-lieu fees on the <br />feasibility of residential projects. Even without this consideration, it is best practice to <br />use a nexus study as guidance to determine the maximum fee that should be charged, <br />and structure the fee program in light of this information. <br /> <br />As such, the City’s 2018 nexus study established the maximum fee rates for the LIHF. <br />Table 5 provided below summarizes the LIHF as of January 1, 2024, and for reference <br />the 2018 maximum fee and actual fee adopted. As shown in the table, while the <br />residential in-lieu fee was set at a rate very close to the maximum, the so-called “linkage <br />fees” for commercial development reflect a deeply discounted rate. In deciding to set <br />the fees well below the maximum for commercial development, the City Council <br />recognized that charging the full amount would be prohibitive, and instead calibrated the <br />fees to be similar to those charged at the time by the neighboring cities of Livermore <br />and Dublin. <br /> <br />Table 5: Lower-Income Housing Fee Rates <br />Category 2018 <br />Maximum <br />Fee Rate <br />2018 Fee <br />Rate <br />Adopted <br />Percent of <br />Maximum <br />2024 Rate, <br />reflecting <br />CPI <br />adjustments <br />Single-Family (per <br />unit>1,500 sq. ft.)* <br />$44,930 $44,248 98.5% $52,203 <br />Single-Family (per unit <br /><1,500 sq. ft.)* <br />$44,930 $43,248 96.2% $51,077 <br />Multi-Family (per unit)* $37,358 $43,293 115% $51,077 <br />Office (per sq. ft.) $82.56 $7.61 9.2% $8.98 <br />Retail (per sq. ft.) $211.08 $4.56 2.1% $5.38 <br />Industrial/Distribution <br />(per sq.ft.) <br />$82.56 $12.64 15.3% $14.91 <br />Lodging (per sq. ft.) $49.69 $3.15 6.3% $3.71 <br />* While the background information is not entirely clear, it appears that adopted fees <br />differ slightly from the maximum fee rate stated in various agenda reports, based on <br />slightly different assumptions around the “typical” single family and multi-family unit <br />size, when the adopted fee was set. The fee study calculated maximum in-lieu fees <br />between $28,431 and $75,857 per unit, for units ranging in size between 1,000 and <br />3,500 square feet. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.