My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PARKS AND RECREATION
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
09122024
>
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2024 3:09:42 PM
Creation date
9/5/2024 3:07:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5-5 <br /> <br />Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br />Section Five – Funding and Implementation Recommendations <br />2014 <br />school sports programs create inequalities in the amount of time the City has access to the <br />facilities. Agreements need to be definitive and specific as to allowed usage. <br />6. Sale or Lease of Surplus Lands ‐ The sale or lease of land or other capital facilities for which the <br />City has no further use can sometimes be a major source of revenue. One‐time receipts from <br />the sale of land can be used for the acquisition of new park lands, recreation facilities, or the <br />development of new community service facilities. Revenues from long‐term leases can be used <br />to provide maintenance or underwrite programs. Surplus parcels also may provide <br />opportunities for trading land elsewhere in the City with other agencies that own land more <br />suitable for park purposes. <br /> <br />5.2 Potential Funding Sources by Facility Type <br /> <br />A summary of the various funding sources for the most appropriate project type is presented in Exhibit <br />5.2‐1. The City should look at developing new sources beyond those currently in use. It should be kept in <br />mind that Quimby fees or other developer fees can only be used to provide facilities for new residents. <br />Funding needs can be satisfied for each improvement through a variety of potential sources as indicated <br />on Exhibit 5.2‐2. The specific funding source to be considered will depend partly on the timing of the <br />development and the funding sources which may be available or which are more easily pursued at that <br />time. For major improvements which include such facilities as community centers, tennis complexes, <br />gymnasiums, senior centers, teen centers, ball field complexes, etc., the use of a fund raising effort to be <br />conducted on behalf of a City’s non‐profit foundation could be beneficial. Sponsorships/ naming rights <br />for major corporate or other private donors can be offered. In some cases, the use of a professional <br />fund raising firm should be considered once a facility or project for which the funding will be used is <br />identified. Other sources of funding for such projects could include public/private partnerships, <br />partnerships with private sector through website advertising, user group contributions, joint use with <br />the school district and public or private grants. Use of bonds or special districts require a vote by the <br />residents and have been used successfully in some communities. The specific facilities and <br />improvements to be paid for need to be identified and a public relations effort is required to enlist the <br />support of the electorate. The greater the demand and recognition of the need by the public, the <br />greater will be the chance of success. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.