Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />P24-0334 Planning Commission <br />5 of 7 <br />Separate Conveyance of Accessory Dwelling Units <br />State law makes it voluntary for the City to adopt an ordinance allowing the separate <br />conveyance of ADUs such that the primary residential unit and the ADU can have <br />separate ownership, i.e., the ADU may be sold as a condominium. At the request of a <br />Commissioner, this topic is being brought forward for consideration and discussion by <br />the Commission as a whole. If the Commission directs the text amendments, staff would <br />bring back at a future meeting draft text amendments for this topic. <br />ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION: CONSIDERATIONS FOR PLEASANTON <br />The proposed text amendments attached to this report are to update the City’s Density <br />Bonus Ordinance and to establish parameters for how to measure from a transit stop. <br /> <br />State Density Bonus Law <br />As noted in this report, State law regarding density bonus has been updated <br />substantially since the City originally adopted its ordinance subsequent to the 4 th Cycle <br />Housing Element. Due to the most recent updates to State law, and as a result of many <br />cities updating their respective municipal codes, ABAG-MTC provided a model <br />ordinance to Bay Area cities to assist in meeting Density Bonus requirements in local <br />ordinances. The draft modifications in Exhibit A are based on the model ordinance and <br />seek to supersede the entirety of the existing language in PMC Chapter 17.38. Since <br />most of the law related to Density Bonus is prescribed by State law– meaning, the City <br />does not have latitude or flexibility in how it implements the ordinance, the amendments <br />seek to simply refer to State law and provide parameters only for elements where <br />jurisdiction-specific latitude is allowed, such as submittal requirements. Further, staff <br />proposes update to sections that would benefit from reference to current State law (e.g., <br />definition of “child care facility” is proposed to mirror the State Health and Safety Code). <br /> <br />Major Transit Stop <br />The proposed amendments related to major transit stops are intended to provide clarity <br />on how the measurement should be taken (i.e., from a single point or a radius around <br />the subject parcel). Recent guidance from ABAG-MTC for implementation of a regional <br />policy indicates, the measurement for the radius should be taken from a single point at <br />the center of the subject station. Exhibit B to this report provide maps of the half-mile <br />radius around the two BART stations and the ACE train station. Aside from this more <br />recent direction from ABAG-MTC, when the City has implemented various sections of <br />State law that refer to a certain distance from a transit stop, it has also measured from a <br />single point. Therefore, the proposed text amendments codify the City’s current <br />practice, which is consistent with guidance from ABAG-MTC for purposes of regional <br />transit-oriented projects. The amendments further propose that if a project site is only <br />partially within the radius measurement, a project is considered to be within the radius if: <br />(1) all parcels comprising the project have at least 75% of their area within the radius; <br />and (2) if residential units are proposed, at least 90 percent of the residential units or <br />100 units, whichever is less, comprising the project are within the radius. Therefore, <br />parcels that are partially within the radius may be relieved from parking requirements <br />only if they meet the above criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />