My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
HUMAN SERVICES
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
10022024
>
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2024 3:09:42 PM
Creation date
9/27/2024 11:15:38 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P a g e | 9 A P P E N D I X B <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br /> Future use of all-weather/synthetic fields should be handled in the budgetary process as a fixed <br />asset with the “carpet” fully depreciated over the anticipated life of the product. With high <br />levels of scheduled play and difficulty in managing unscheduled play, synthetic fields would <br />eliminate field closures and extend play opportunities. All-weather fields typically cost more <br />than regular grass fields but they achieve payback against the costs as a result of increased field <br />usage and reduced maintenance costs, thus showing a good return on investment. A typical <br />synthetic field will have a life of 10-12 years. <br /> <br /> If the City determines a move in this direction, the budget should fully depreciate the cost of <br />replacement over a 10 year period. The dollars saved on maintenance could be used to partially <br />offset the cost of depreciation of the fields. <br /> <br /> All weather synthetic turf fields can support substantially more play than grass fields. Further, <br />synthetic fields can easily be lined for several different sports, thus helping to meet the needs of <br />new emerging sports such as lacrosse. When a system considers the cost of land and the cost of <br />sports fields they should consider all weather synthetic fields as an alternative and do a cost <br />benefit analysis on the options in order to determine the best alternative for them to follow. <br /> <br /> Sports field design standards should be developed. Development and use of these design <br />standards and guidelines needs to be put in place for future development to limit maintenance <br />costs especially when sports fields double as a drainage basins. Standards to consider are traffic <br />and pedestrian circulation, parking, athletic use areas, restroom/concession location and design. <br /> <br /> Annually test soil to assess nutrient deficiencies, following with an application of appropriate <br />fertilizer and/or soil additives to promote healthily root growth. <br /> <br /> Monitor soil moisture conditions and irrigate turf areas to provide adequate moisture for <br />healthy growth while maintaining a playable surface that is not muddy, spongy or over <br />saturated. This will help to prevent tearing and uprooting of the turf and topsoil under normal <br />playing conditions. <br /> <br /> Establish policies appropriate for the installation and management of synthetic playing fields <br />including: <br />o Synthetic fields should be installed only at facilities which also have lights for night-time <br />play. <br />o A policy that states synthetic fields will be open for play except under extreme weather <br />conditions. <br /> <br /> Lighting systems should be inspected on a regular basis for proper alignment and functioning to <br />avoid dark spots at night that could be hazardous to players and light spill to surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.