My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
HUMAN SERVICES
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
10022024
>
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2024 3:09:42 PM
Creation date
9/27/2024 11:15:38 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P a g e | 16 A P P E N D I X B <br />Recommendations <br /> <br /> Skate parks should be regularly inspected and maintained to limit debris collection within the <br />facility which can present a hazard to park users. <br /> <br /> Cracking in the concrete should be immediately identified through a regular inspection program <br />in immediately sealed to prevent further damage from moisture within and under the concrete. <br /> <br /> Expand the Community Garden program to provide opportunities for additional city residents to <br />participate in the program. Many underutilized areas of parks could be potential sites for a <br />community garden, such as locations within Kottinger Community Park and at the Marilyn <br />Murphy Kane trailhead where water is available. <br /> <br /> Explore opportunities for the development of at least two (2) additional Dog Parks utilizing <br />existing or future parkland that is underutilized and would not result in the displacement of a <br />current recreational use. Potential locations to be evaluated could include the Bernal Property, <br />Staples Ranch Community Park and/or a Community Park site within the East Pleasanton <br />Specific Plan. <br /> <br />Park Signage <br /> <br />Existing Conditions <br /> <br />Park signage was well maintained and generally standardized throughout the system. Meadows Park <br />was an example of non-standardized sign. A few signs showed some previous evidence of damage from <br />graffiti. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br /> Park signage should be regularly inspected for theft, damage and graffiti. <br /> <br /> Park name signs could be enhanced with limited landscaping of seasonal colors. <br /> <br /> The City should maintain a formalized signage system that is uniform in terms of sign types, a <br />positive approach toward rules, colors, and materials. Effort should be made to ensure that <br />park signs exhibit rules and regulations in a positive context. This will help residents better <br />identify parks and make maintenance replacement and repairs less complicated. <br /> <br />Fencing <br /> <br />Existing Conditions <br /> <br />Park and decorative metal fencing was found at various locations throughout the system utilized both as <br />decoration and pedestrian control. Overall this fencing appeared to be well maintained and in good <br />condition with limited damage and little rust. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.