My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
HUMAN SERVICES
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
10022024
>
Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2024 3:09:42 PM
Creation date
9/27/2024 11:15:38 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P a g e | 21 A P P E N D I X B <br />Use of Native Plants—The City currently has no formalized policy in place although staff clearly <br />makes efforts at the utilization of native species. A formalized policy should be developed identifying <br />acceptable species based on the ecoregion and requiring plantings of a minimum of 80% these identified <br />natives in any new or renovated project. The approach of the policy could be based on plants endemic <br />to the Mediterranean climate of California, identifying benefits to other native species, and mandate <br />that 80% of new planting must be classified as Native. Another and perhaps additional approach would <br />be to develop a drought tolerant plant policy that adopts appropriate plant material list by drought <br />tolerant level (low, medium, high) and require that 100% meet medium level and 90% high levels. <br /> <br /> <br />Naturalize Parks—The City should undertake an effort to inventory and establish areas where <br />parks could be naturalized by the removal of turf and other non-native plantings and replaced with <br />natives. <br /> <br />Community Gardens—the City has a limited program in place at Val Vista Park, although there <br />are many locations within the park system for the development of “unused spaces” as community <br />gardens. <br /> <br />Recycling of Park Waste—there was no evidence of standard recycling containers within the <br />park for public use. <br /> <br />Green Waste/Composting—The City should expand the program for the composting of green <br />waste resulting from park maintenance. <br /> <br />Demonstration Gardens—The City should develop demonstration gardens with identified native <br />plantings which would be appropriate for homeowner landscaping. <br /> <br />Storm Water Retention/Bio swales—Fawn Hill Park has a well-developed bio swale that has <br />been landscaped with native grasses. This type of development should be expanded throughout the <br />park system especially adjacent to hardscapes such as road and parking lots. <br /> <br />Use of Impervious Surfaces—Very little use of impervious surfaces with the majority of traffic <br />areas developed with concrete or asphalt. In contradiction, some trails should be paved to encourage <br />use as a transportation route. <br /> <br />Use of Alternative Energy Sources—No program in place and no alternative energy use within <br />the park system. <br /> <br />Utility Reduction Program—Staff should expand the tracking of utility consumption to each <br />park unit by month. <br /> <br />Habitat Development—Currently there is no program in place within the City and many park <br />creeks are excellent candidates for habitat enhancement projects. The City is required by California <br />Department of Fish and Game to monitor and report on Bernal and Kottinger Creeks. <br /> <br />Public Education of Sustainable Practices-- Currently there is a limited program in place within <br />the City where funding provides for a full-time naturalist. The program is anticipated to expand as the <br />City recently hired an additional part-time naturalist.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.