My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
111924 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2026 12:24:12 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 3:02:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/19/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
420
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 8 <br />Housing Element Sites, to align with the amendments to the IZO and make other clarifying <br />changes. <br /> <br />The City Council held workshops in May and August as part of the study process. <br /> <br />May 7, 2024 Workshop <br />At an introductory workshop on May 7, 2024, City Council reviewed and discussed the results <br />of EPS' initial analysis, including an evaluation of potential changes to the affordable housing <br />inclusionary rate, along with other initial findings and recommendations with respect to impact <br />fees more generally. The latter discussion focused on seeking a balance between establishing <br />fees at a rate that would appropriately mitigate development impacts, while being mindful of <br />potentially negative impacts on development feasibility that could impede other City financial <br />and policy goals. EPS evaluated various inclusionary scenarios, including some scenarios that <br />would increase the current inclusionary rate, and others that would retain or reduce those <br />rates. EPS also looked at the resultant equivalent in-lieu fee, if set at a level reflecting the <br />equivalent cost to subsidize those same affordable units constructed elsewhere, and the <br />overall feasibility of setting fees at those equivalent rates. Based on the analysis, staff’s initial <br />recommendation was to set the inclusionary rate for all types of residential projects at 15% <br />(i.e., decrease the current single-family/ownership rate and retain the existing multi-family <br />rate). Additional detail and supporting analysis is provided in the May 7, 2024 Agenda Report <br />and attachments; minutes of the May 7 workshop are included in Attachment 2 to this report. <br /> <br />August 20, 2024 Workshop <br />The City Council held a follow-up workshop on August 20, 2024, focused on the Inclusionary <br />Zoning Ordinance. At this meeting, EPS provided additional analysis and refined scenarios for <br />the inclusionary rate and in-lieu affordable housing fee; staff also provided analysis and <br />requested City Council direction on several key policy questions for the update of the IZO. <br />Consensus direction was provided based on a straw-poll vote by a majority of the City Council <br />on each of the policy items, although it is noted there was not unanimity on every point. (See <br />Attachment 2, Minutes from the May 7 and August 20, 2024 City Council Workshops). The <br />outcomes and recommendations made by the City Council are outlined further in the analysis <br />and discussion of the amendments to the IZO, in the Disucssion section below. With respect to <br />the inclusionary rate and affordability levels, the City Council supported staff's recommendation <br />to establish the rate at 15% for both rental and ownership projects, with a moderate-income <br />target affordability for ownership units, and lower-income affordability for rental units. <br />Additional detail and supporting analysis is provided in the August 20, 2024 Agenda Report <br />and attachments. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 11, 2024, to review and <br />provide a recommendation to City Council for adoption of the updated IZO and related <br />amendments to PMC 17.40, 18.38, and the 2023 Objective Design Standards for Housing <br />Element Sites. By a 4-1 vote (Mohan voting “no”) the Planning Commission recommended the <br />City Council approve the amendments as recommended by staff. As described below, the <br />Planning Commission suggested more information be provided to City Council to support <br />recommendations concerning minimum unit sizes. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Page 88 of 658
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.