My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
121724
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 11:39:08 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 11:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Comprehensive Fee Update and Nexus Study November 2024 <br /> <br /> 46 <br />affordable rates tends to be greater for ownership units, therefore the affordability <br />level for these units is set at Moderate-income (120% AMI). For rental units, the <br />affordable units will be evenly split between Very Low-income and Low-income <br />households (50% and 60% AMI, respectively). <br />Table 27 Inclusionary Housing Requirements <br /> <br />Methodology <br />To calculate the subsidy needed to support the development of affordable units, EPS <br />developed several residential prototypes to determine their respective development <br />costs and estimated anticipated revenues. <br />Housing Prototypes <br />The prototype residential products used in the feasibility analysis were informed by <br />EPS research on the local housing market. Research included review of recent <br />developments and proposed projects, discussions with developers active in the region, <br />and discussions with City staff. The chosen prototypes include one rental prototype – <br />podium multifamily apartments - and three for-sale prototypes – condominiums, <br />townhomes, and single-family detached homes. <br />The critical differentiator between the for-sale prototypes is the density at which they <br />are built and how parking is provided, with the condominium product assumed to be <br />built at a higher density (45 units per acre) than the townhome product (20 units per <br />acre) and with wrap-around style parking. The townhome product is assumed to <br />include an attached, “tuck-under” garage. The single-family detached product is <br />assumed to be developed at an even lower density (5 units per acre) and with an <br />attached garage. The analysis also assumes that the prototypical townhome is smaller <br />than the prototypical single-family home. In some cases, there may be additional <br />design factors – such as whether a unit is detached or attached – that are used to <br />define a project as a townhome or single-family home. This analysis does not account <br />for those types of factors, only differentiating the two prototypes based on density, <br />parking, and unit size. <br />Overall <br />V ery Low Income <br />(50% of AMI) <br />Low Income <br />(60% of AMI) <br />Moderate Income <br />(120% of AMI) <br />Ownership 15% 0% 0% 15% <br />Rental 15% 7.5% 7.5% 0% <br />Source: City of Pleasanton <br />Page 107 of 893
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.