Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton Comprehensive Fee Update and Nexus Study November 2024 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />the City as appropriate and documented herein. The level of service is articulated in <br />the CIP provided in Appendix A-1. <br />x Per Square Foot Residential Fees: AB 602 notes that for fees adopted after July <br />1, 2022, the nexus study must “either calculate a fee levied or imposed on a <br />housing development proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units, <br />or make specific findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric <br />to calculate the fees.” AB 602 also notes that “This bill would require that a local <br />agency that calculates fees proportionately to the square footage of the proposed <br />units be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship <br />between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.” This analysis <br />relies on assumptions about the average unit size for residential units developed <br />following market research and conversations with City staff. The average home <br />sizes were then applied to the per unit fees, to determine the maximum per square <br />foot fee for both single family and multifamily development. <br />All State statutory requirements have been followed in establishing this DIF, as <br />documented in subsequent chapters. Chapter 6 summarizes the specific findings that <br />explain or demonstrate this nexus. If the DIF is adopted, this Nexus Study and the <br />technical information it contains should be maintained and reviewed periodically by the <br />City to ensure its accuracy and to enable the adequate programming of funding sources. <br />To the extent that infrastructure requirements, costs, and development potential changes <br />over time, the DIF will need to be updated. AB 602 requires the DIF to be updated at <br />least every 8 years. <br />Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees <br />Inclusionary housing programs require that new market-rate residential development <br />projects include a certain percentage of housing units at rents or sale prices that are <br />affordable to lower-income households. Instead of providing required affordable housing <br />units on site, developers may opt to pay an in-lieu fee. Local governments gain the <br />authority to enact inclusionary housing programs and charge in-lieu fees through their <br />general police power to regulate the development and use of real property.2 The City of <br />Pleasanton is updating its Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, and as part of the process is <br />updating the in-lieu fee levels. These in-lieu fees are not “mitigation fees” and therefore <br />do not require a nexus study illustrating demand generated by new housing <br />developments. The City’s authority impose in-lieu fees was confirmed with the approval <br />of AB 1505 in 2017 which allows jurisdictions to require the inclusion of affordable <br />housing in new rental housing projects, thereby superseding the 2009 decision of <br />Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al. v. City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th <br />1396. <br /> <br />2 California Building Industry Assn. v. City of San Jose, 61 Cal.4th 435 (2015). <br />Page 67 of 893