Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> <br />THE STATE LEGISLATURE, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND <br />THE VOTERS <br />The options available to local officials in governing, managing their finances and raising revenues to <br />provide services needed by their communities are limited. Voters have placed restrictions as well as <br />protections in the state constitution. The state’s voters and the California Legislature have acted in <br />various ways, to support and provide, and to limit and withdraw financial powers and resources from <br />cities, counties and special districts. <br />Some of the most significant limitations on the local revenue-raising include: <br />• Property taxes may not be increased except with a two-thirds vote to fund a general obligation <br />bond. <br />• The allocation of local property tax among a county, and cities, special districts and school <br />districts within each county is controlled by the Legislature. <br />• Voter approval is required prior to enacting, increasing or extending any type of local tax. <br />• Assessments to pay for public facilities that benefit real property require property owner <br />approval. <br />• Fees for the use of local agency facilities and for services may not exceed the reasonable cost <br />of providing those facilities and services. <br />• Fees for services such as water, sewer and trash collection are subject to property owner <br />majority protest. <br />The Legislature has enacted many complicated changes in state and local revenues over the past 30 <br />years. Voters have approved state constitutional protections limiting many of these actions at times <br />followed by even more complicated maneuvers by the Legislature in efforts to solve the financial <br />troubles and interests of the state budget. <br />Reacting to actions of the Legislature and the deterioration of local control of fiscal matters, local <br />government interests placed on the ballot, and voters approved, Proposition 1A in 2004 and Proposition <br />22 in 2010. Together, these measures prohibit the state from: <br />• Enacting most local government mandates without fully funding their costs. The definition of <br />state mandate includes a transfer of responsibility or funding of a program for which the state <br />previously had full or partial responsibility. <br />• Reducing the local portion of the sales and use tax rate or altering its method of allocation, <br />except to comply with federal law or an interstate compact. <br />• Reducing the combined share of property tax revenues going to the county as well as cities and <br />special districts in a county. <br />• Borrowing, delaying or taking motor vehicle fuel tax allocations, gasoline sales tax allocations, <br />or public transportation account funds. <br /> <br />Page 25 of 109