My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
010925 WORKSHOP
>
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 11:52:04 AM
Creation date
1/3/2025 2:45:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/9/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Financial Management for Elected Officials January 2013 <br /> <br />Institute for Local Government www.ca-ilg.org 17 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Capital Financing and Debt Management <br /> <br />Debt financing is neither a “bad” nor a “good”—it is simply a tool for achieving community <br />goals. However, debt does come at the price of costs of issuance and interest charges, as well as <br />the obligation to make regular loan payments and conform to market disclosure and terms of the <br />debt instruments on an ongoing basis.27 Allowing these payments to become a dominant part of <br />the agency’s budget limits the agency’s ability to respond to unplanned expenses. <br /> <br />Debt financing is usually appropriate for: <br /> <br />• Temporary Short-Term Cash Flow Issues. An agency may need to bridge cash flow gaps <br />while waiting to receive key revenues (like property taxes in December and franchise fees in <br />April). The agency may cover these gaps by issuing “tax” or “revenue” anticipation notes <br />(sometimes known by the acronym “TRANs”). In this case, any amount borrowed must <br />generally be paid back within a year. <br /> <br />• Long-Term Improvements. Debt financing is also appropriate for truly high-priority, one- <br />time improvements – when it makes sense for current taxpayers to share the cost with those <br />who will benefit 20 or 30 years in the future. By contrast, borrowing for ongoing operational <br />expenses or short-term capital needs is inadvisable. The length of the debt should never <br />exceed the useful life of the debt-financed asset. <br /> <br />Any agency’s ability to borrow and repay debt capacity is limited. Amounts borrowed for <br />today’s project are funds that cannot be borrowed tomorrow. Amounts required for debt <br />repayment in the future are funds that will not be available for other programs and services. <br /> <br />Recognizing the significance of the decision to incur long-term debt for a public agency, <br />California’s constitution requires the public voters to approve debt 28 that would be repaid from <br />future general fund revenues.29 While there are a number of exceptions to this requirement <br />(including the special fund doctrine for revenue bonds 30 and an exception for financing leases), <br />the constitutional principle is important to keep in mind. Incurring debt obligates the community <br />into the future and reduces financial flexibility. Accordingly, the benefits of doing so should <br />outweigh these costs.31 <br />Questions to Ask <br /> <br />• Does the agency have a multi-year capital improvement plan? (Having such a plan enables decision-makers to consider key factors like project priorities, debt capacity and what role fees will play in financing). <br />o If the agency has such a plan, is it realistic? If not, what steps are necessary to make it realistic? <br />Page 67 of 109
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.