Laserfiche WebLink
I✓ <br />L <br />L <br />L <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Sole Source Justification <br />Sole source purchases are goods and services available from only one supplier/vendor or meets the listed criteria. Purchases for items that cannot be <br />procured through the competitive bidding process must be documented as to why the item(s) is considered sole source. <br />I Requester Name : Dan Sodergren !Title: City Attorney <br />Requested Sole Source Company:Jarvis Fay LLP <br />Contact Name:Jarvis Fay LLP !Email: <br />Address: <br />Description of Product or Service: <br />legal Services on an ad-needed basis. <br />Project Schedule (when do you need the product or service by?): <br />Comclete the followina checklist· This is a sole source vendor because· <br />Sole provider of a licensed or patented good or service. <br />Sole provider of items that are repair parts of or updates to existing equipment, systems. <br />Sole provider of factory-authorized warranty service. <br />I Dept: City A11ome1·'s Qfi/ce <br />I Phone: 510-238-1400 <br />I Estimated Cost:$ 100,000.00 <br />Sole provider of unique equipment, products and/or services not offered by others. Please provide brief explanation <br />Jarvis Fay has specialized skills/or CEQA and land use, particular(v in Alameda County. Past representation of the City makes this.firm's <br />atlorneys knowledgeable about our General Plan and Zoning code. <br />Only company available to provide service and/or supplies to meet project schedule. In a brief explanation, provide supporting evidence of <br />why other contractors are considered to be unable to meet the project schedule. <br />There is a substantial technical risk in contracting with any other contractor, (e.g., only one contractor has been successful to date in <br />implementing a difficult manufacturing process). In a brief explanation, provide supporting evidence that explains why other contractors are <br />considered to be unable to overcome the substantial technical risk. <br />There is no reasonable expectation that a meaningful cost or other improvement could be realized over the incumbent contractor's <br />performance (e.g., the changes of another firm winning a competition are clearly remote. Please provide a brief explanation. <br />What steps were taken to verify that these features are not available elsewhere? <br />Other brands/manufacturers/companies were examined (List specific company names, phone number and contact names, and explain why <br />these were not suitable). <br />Ci�r Allorney's office also comracts with Goldfarb & Lipman. Downey Brand and Meyers Nnvejor speciali=ed legc,l services. Jarvis Fay <br />rate�· are cheaper than these otlrerllliv_llrms. in addiIio11. Jarvis /fo· /,as great land use expertise. See a/ladredjurfi1rther explanation. <br />Other vendors were contacted (List specific company names, phone numbers and contact names, and explain why these were not suitable). <br />What specific feature makes this item and/or company unique and why is this needed for your project? <br />Recjuestors Signature: Date: <br />Department Head Signature: Date: <br />Director of Finance Approval: Date: <br />Docusign Envelope ID: A62806E6-D068-4935-ACB3-6D4D37CACD88