Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 75 <br />MONITORING PLAN <br />5.1 Assessing Our Progress <br />The City needs a way to track actions completed within <br />the Implementation Plan to measure the progress it <br />makes towards its urban forest goals. The Community <br />Assessment and Goal- Setting Tool was created by the <br />Vibrant Cities Lab just for this purpose. Vibrant Cities Lab <br />is a collaboration of partners which includes the United <br />States Forest Service, American Forests, and the National <br />Association of Regional Councils, and serves as an o nline <br />hub of urban forest and tree research, best practices, and <br />planning tools (http://vibrantcitieslab.com). The Assessment <br />and Goal-Setting Tool is based on research of urban forest <br />sustainability and establishes criteria and indicators to <br />measure urban forest sustainability. The tool is used as an <br />assessment to define the City’s current state of a specific <br />area of urban forest sustainability. The user decides what <br />the City’s current state of the metric is, and then sets where <br />the goal metric should be. Each metric is assigned a point <br />value, and the City is assigned a “Total Current Score” and <br />a “Gap Score,” or how far off the current state is from the <br />desired goal. A city that has a gap score between 20 to <br />40 is not far from achieving the goals of its urban forest <br />program. Conversely, gap scores of 40+ indicates that a <br />City is still implementing programs and policies to close the <br />gap and develop a sustainable urban forest. <br />Pleasanton’s first assessment was conducted on September 8, <br />2024, by City staff and the consultant team. Table 5-1 reflects <br />the results from the first assessment, which set the baseline <br />for the City’s “Total Current Score” at its pre-UFMP metrics. <br />Staff used Vibrant Cities Lab’s rating descriptions to determine <br />Pleasanton’s status (prior to the UFMP process) for the various <br />categories and then chose the goals they want to achieve in <br />each category to determine the gap between the two ratings. <br />Based on the first assessment, the City has a current rating <br />of 17, with a gap score of 78. The City’s UFMP monitoring <br />plan should be based around the Vibrant Cities Lab <br />Community Assessment and Goal Setting Tool and be <br />retaken each year to track, measure, and highlight progress. <br />The assessment can also be used to demonstrate successes <br />and justify additional funding asks to City Council. After <br />the completion of this UFMP, several of the responses that <br />had significant gaps such as the lack of a UFMP (5) and an <br />urban tree canopy assessment (5), will have already been <br />achieved.