Laserfiche WebLink
78 | CITY OF PLEASANTON URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN <br />MONITORING PLAN <br />Category Current Rating Goal Rating Gap <br />Engage <br />large private <br />landowners and <br />institutions <br />Large private landholders are generally <br />uninformed about urban forest issues <br />and opportunities. <br />-1 Resident involvement in low canopy/high need <br />areas. Residents participate actively in 4 <br />All utilities <br />work with <br />municipality, <br />employ best <br />management <br />practices <br />Utilities take actions impacting urban <br />forest with no municipal coordination.1 Identifying needs for their neighborhoods, <br />planning, implementation and monitoring 4 <br />Green industry <br />embraces goals, <br />high standards <br />Little or no cooperation among <br />segments of green industry or <br />awareness of municipality-wide urban <br />forest goals and objectives. <br />-1 <br />Urban forest recognized as vital to the <br />community’s environmental, social, and <br />economic well-being. <br />3 <br />Develop <br />urban forest <br />management <br />plan <br />No urban forest management plan -1 <br />Tree management plans developed with input <br />from community, and public access to the <br />property’s forest resource. <br />4 3 <br />Cooperative <br />planning <br />with other <br />municipalities <br />Municipalities have no interaction with <br />each other or the broader region. No <br />regional planning or coordination on <br />urban forestry. <br />-1 Utilities are included in informal municipal <br />teams that communicate regularly and 3 5 <br />Table 5-1. Tree Canopy Goal Assessment Summary (Pre-UFMP)