My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
APPENDICES
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PARKS AND RECREATION
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
APPENDICES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2025 10:21:11 AM
Creation date
2/6/2025 3:42:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/13/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 20 <br />pollution processing and interpolation, and updated pollutant monetary values (Hirabayashi et al 2011; Hirabayashi <br />et al 2012; Hirabayashi 2011). <br />Trees remove PM2.5 and PM10* when particulate matter is deposited on leaf surfaces (Nowak et al 2013). This <br />deposited PM2.5 and PM10* can be resuspended to the atmosphere or removed during rain events and dissolved or <br />transferred to the soil. This combination of events can lead to positive or negative pollution removal and value <br />depending on various atmospheric factors. Generally, PM2.5 and PM10* removal is positive with positive benefits. <br />However, there are some cases when net removal is negative or resuspended particles lead to increased pollution <br />concentrations and negative values. During some months (e.g., with no rain), trees resuspend more particles than <br />they remove. Resuspension can also lead to increased overall PM2.5 and PM10* concentrations if the boundary layer <br />conditions are lower during net resuspension periods than during net removal periods. Since the pollution removal <br />value is based on the change in pollution concentration, it is possible to have situations when trees remove PM2.5 <br />and PM10* but increase concentrations and thus have negative values during periods of positive overall removal. <br />These events are not common, but can happen. <br />For reports in the United States, default air pollution removal value is calculated based on local incidence of adverse <br />health effects and national median externality costs. The number of adverse health effects and associated economic <br />value is calculated for ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns using data <br />from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP) <br />(Nowak et al 2014). The model uses a damage-function approach that is based on the local change in pollution <br />concentration and population. National median externality costs were used to calculate the value of carbon <br />monoxide removal (Murray et al 1994). <br />For international reports, user-defined local pollution values are used. For international reports that do not have local <br />values, estimates are based on either European median externality values (van Essen et al 2011) or BenMAP <br />regression equations (Nowak et al 2014) that incorporate user-defined population estimates. Values are then <br />converted to local currency with user-defined exchange rates. <br />For this analysis, pollution removal value is calculated based on the prices of $1,488 per ton (carbon monoxide), <br />$3,479 per ton (ozone), $714 per ton (nitrogen dioxide), $0 per ton (sulfur dioxide), $120,163 per ton (particulate <br />matter less than 2.5 microns), $0 per ton (particulate matter less than 10 microns and greater than 2.5 microns). <br />Carbon Storage and Sequestration: <br />Carbon storage is the amount of carbon bound up in the above-ground and below-ground parts of woody vegetation. <br />To calculate current carbon storage, biomass for each tree was calculated using equations from the literature and <br />measured tree data. Open-grown, maintained trees tend to have less biomass than predicted by forest-derived <br />biomass equations (Nowak 1994). To adjust for this difference, biomass results for open-grown urban trees were <br />multiplied by 0.8. No adjustment was made for trees found in natural stand conditions. Tree dry-weight biomass was <br />converted to stored carbon by multiplying by 0.5. <br />Carbon sequestration is the removal of carbon dioxide from the air by plants. To estimate the gross amount of carbon <br />sequestered annually, average diameter growth from the appropriate genera and diameter class and tree condition <br />was added to the existing tree diameter (year x) to estimate tree diameter and carbon storage in year x+1. <br />Carbon storage and carbon sequestration values are based on estimated or customized local carbon values. For <br />international reports that do not have local values, estimates are based on the carbon value for the United States <br />(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2015, Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon 2015) and <br />converted to local currency with user-defined exchange rates. <br />For this analysis, carbon storage and carbon sequestration values are calculated based on $171 per ton.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.