Laserfiche WebLink
3/11/2025 <br />7 <br />Recommendations <br />1.Should the applicant’s application include residential uses in the Livermore <br />Airport Protection Area? <br />Recommendation: Proposed project may include residential uses in the APA, with <br />further analysis prepared to inform future City Council determination as to potential <br />override of an ALUC non-compliance determination <br />2.What should be the maximum total number of units in the applicant’s <br />preferred plan? <br />Recommendation: Proceed with a project description reflecting the greatest density that <br />the City may be willing to accept on the site for the purposes of CEQA and Project <br />Review <br />3.Does City Council support the applicant’s proposed proportion <br />(approx.15%) of age-restricted units in the preferred plan? <br />No staff recommendation <br />Recommendations <br />4.Does the City Council support the Preferred Plan’s affordable housing <br />approach? <br />a) Clustering of the affordable multifamily apartments in one area of the site <br />vs. more dispersed, for-sale deed restricted units? <br />b) Constructing all inclusionary units on site, vs. combination of inclusionary <br />units and affordable housing fees? <br />c) If a combination of on-site units and fees, what is the minimum number of <br />on-site affordable units? <br />Recommendation: <br />•Clustering vs. Dispersed (No specific recommendation) <br />•On-Site vs. In-lieu Fees: Affirm prior direction to allow a combination of <br />units and fees, and provide direction on proportion of AH units on-site. <br />13 <br />14 <br />Page 345 of 348