Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 5 <br />adequate provisions for management and maintenance of common areas, including lienholder <br />consent and the formation of a homeowners association for the primary unit and ADU. <br /> <br />As was discussed in the October 15, 2024 City Council Agenda Report (page 62), many <br />residential neighborhoods in Pleasanton are part of a Planned Unit Development and subject <br />to an HOA and its CC&Rs. No jurisdictions similar to Pleasanton (i.e., with many planned unit <br />developments and active HOAs) have adopted an ordinance to permit separate conveyance. <br />Staff proposes that allowing separate conveyance for properties with existing HOAs could <br />raise complex questions; for example, about how HOA dues would be assessed, and how <br />ADU subdivisions would interface with existing CC&Rs and property maintenance and <br />easement agreements. <br /> <br />Given these complexities, the prevalence of HOAs in Pleasanton, unknown level of interest <br />among property owners in separate conveyance, and added administration for both staff and <br />existing HOAs to allow separate conveyance of the principal unit, staff does not recommend <br />dedicating limited staff resources to developing a local ordinance to allow separate <br />conveyance at this time. If there proves to be substantial property owner interest, and the <br />opportunity to learn from the experience of other similar communities, adopting such an <br />ordinance may be appropriate in the future. The Planning Commission supported staff’s <br />recommendation not to introduce PMC amendments with respect to separate conveyance. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />The proposed code amendments are statutorily exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15282(h) in that CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance implementing state ADU law. The <br />proposed amendments are also statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15268, in that the <br />amendments are necessary to conform to and implement the ministerial approval processes mandated by <br />State law. The amendments are further exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) in that <br />there is no possibility the activity will have a significant effect on the environment. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 12, 2025, to review and provide a <br />recommendation to the City Council on the proposed actions. The Planning Commission unanimously <br />recommended approval of the amendments. The Planning Commission did not recommend pursuing the <br />adoption of separate conveyance of ADUs pursuant to AB 1033, given the limited applicability, complexity of <br />review process and demand on staff time. There was no public comment provided during the hearing. <br /> <br />EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY <br />ADUs and JADUs contribute to the creation of affordable housing within the city, and are often <br />used for multi-generational families. Adoption of this ordinance may reduce barriers to <br />constructing ADUs and JADUs. <br /> <br />OUTREACH <br />Notification of this code amendment has been published in The Valley Times as an upcoming <br />agenda item for the March 18, 2025, City Council meeting. <br /> <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />Approval of this action advances the strategic goal of Building a Community Where Everyone <br />Belongs of the ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan, in that the amendments may further production <br />Page 69 of 348