Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br /> <br />Please note that the total potential reduction number is a rounded estimate and will <br />be reflned in the flnal budget, based on City Council direction. It is possible to <br />reduce support by a different amount, if desired, or to fund only a subset of the grant <br />requests. <br />With respect to the other Tri-Valley Cities, Pleasanton has routinely allocated <br />signiflcantly more General Fund dollars to human services organizations than <br />Dublin and Livermore. Past years’ General Fund contributions for Livermore and <br />Dublin have been approximately $80-100k, although have varied, and will again <br />differ for the upcoming 2-year grant cycle. Funding decisions by the Cities of Dublin <br />and Livermore appear to have been made as a policy/budget decision by the <br />respective City Councils, rather than using a speciflc formula or methodology. <br />Pleasanton has generally used an infiator that increases the amount of the General <br />Fund grant funding by the overall increase to the General Fund budget. <br />Staff also notes, in recent years, both Dublin and Livermore have used local sources <br />other than General Fund to supplement their federal HOME and CDBG allocations, <br />including in Dublin, ARPA funds (which will no longer be available after the next <br />Fiscal Year), and in Livermore the “Social Opportunity Endowment” (SOE), which is a <br />local fund supported by one-time community beneflt contributions negotiated as