Laserfiche WebLink
Qy�NSA iyTo�G City Council Regular Meeting - <br />Submit your written public <br />comment <br />OPL'NNED QV City of Pleasanton <br />Full Name First Name: Todd <br />Last Name: Nelson <br />Email (this entry is disclosable 654tnelson@gmail.com <br />if included) <br />Submitted On: <br />Apr 7, 2025, 12:28PM PDT <br />City Council Meeting Date April 08, 2025 05:00 PM <br />Meeting Type Special Meeting at 5:00 pm <br />Agenda Item Number 3 <br />Comments I support CIP projects improving bike/ped infrastructure, but I am not <br />sure that the 580 Overcrossing and Trail Pavement Resurfacing <br />projects represent the community's priority. <br />The 580 Overcrossing is presented as the third priority in the <br />bike/ped Master Plan. But the original project given that priority <br />included 680. Reducing it from eight overcrossings to three changes <br />its priority considerably. I would argue that Hacienda and Hopyard <br />both have low -stress alternatives nearby, leaving only Santa Rita in <br />need of improvement. See more on my blog post: <br />https ://write. as/foots teps/580-680-overcros s ing <br />I don't recall discussing the Trail Pavement Resurfacing project. How <br />many miles of trail are in need of repaving? Using $500k of Measure <br />BB funds means that those funds cannot be used for projects that <br />may be of higher priority for the community. There are unfinished <br />projects where fatalities have occurred. Measure BB requires public <br />input and City Council approval of projects. Has this happened? <br />