My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
04-23
>
AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 5:17:26 PM
Creation date
4/22/2025 5:02:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
888
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 101 <br />inadvertent exposure of possible cultural materials. In the event exposed soils <br />indicate cultural materials may be present, this may be followed by regular or <br />periodic archaeological monitoring as determined by the Archaeologist, but <br />full-time archaeological monitoring is not recommended at this time. The <br />proposed project would be required to follow the City’s standard condition <br />of approval that would require all construction to stop in the event that <br />human remains were uncovered during excavation. <br />The proposed project would also be required to follow procedures outlined in <br />Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Public <br />Resources Code Section 5097.98 as well as General Plan Program 5.3, which <br />requires the cessation of all construction and grading activities within the <br />vicinity of any discovered prehistoric or historic artifacts, including burial sites, <br />until any such find is evaluated by a qualified professional Archaeologist and <br />appropriate mitigation is approved by the City. Environmental effects would <br />be avoided by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or <br />standards. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to <br />the proposed project. The proposed project would not result in a new or <br />more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Housing <br />Element Update FEIR. <br />d-e) Listed or Eligible Tribal Cultural Resources and Lead Agency Determined Tribal <br />Cultural Resources <br />Would the project: d) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a <br />Tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section <br />21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is <br />geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the <br />landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a <br />California Native American Tribe, and that is listed or eligible for <br />listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local <br />register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code <br />Section 5020.1(k)? <br />e) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a <br />Tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section <br />21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is <br />geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the <br />landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a <br />California Native American Tribe, and that is a resource <br />determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by <br />substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth <br />in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.