Laserfiche WebLink
The Fee Policy is established to assist all departments in determining how any specific fee <br />should be established, to help assure equitable treatment of all citizens and to structure the <br />maintenance of fees at a current cost level. <br />Furthermore, the Fee Policy establishes categories of services for which the City desires to <br />collect such fees and upon which the level of cost recovery is determined. <br />A. GENERAL POLICY <br />It is the general policy of the City of Pleasanton to recover its costs of service from the <br />individuals and/or groups served to the extent that individual members of the public are <br />benefiting from specific City facilities or personnel in a way different from that enjoyed by <br />all citizens. To the extent that the City organizes some of its activities into enterprise funds, <br />such activities should recover all of their costs even if they benefit essentially all of the <br />citizens. <br />B. CATEGORIES OF SERVICE <br />From a policy standpoint, the Council expects City services to be placed in one of six <br />categories before a fee is established or considered for any specific service: <br />1. Development which impacts municipal infrastructure costs. <br />When additional housing or commercial units are being built, it is the City's policy to charge <br />them for the costs of the additional roadways, road widening(s), traffic control devices, <br />water/sewer lines or processing capacity, and other related capital costs the City must <br />spend to support the new development and the impacts it creates. The policy of the City <br />Council is that these fees will include all cost expended or expected to be expended by the <br />City in creating or performing these support activities, either in cash or in such in-kind as <br />may be approved by the City Manager, as provided by State legislation. <br />2. Fees or charges designed to discourage improper behavior. <br />This would include traffic fines, parking enforcement, vandalism repair, theft or willful <br />destruction of City property, building code infractions, etc. There is no need for these <br />charges to be constrained by the cost of the enforcement activity. While they should at <br />least meet this cost, they will generally be expected to be more than the cost of <br />enforcement to discourage repeat offenses. <br />3. Services designed to control activities which could be harmful to others. <br />This includes fire inspection fees, many types of police permits, building inspections, etc. In <br />these cases, the individual has probably done nothing wrong, but is engaged in an activity <br />which could be harmful to others if conducted incorrectly. These fees should be set at full <br />217 <br />