CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Nelson Fialho/Mr. David Haglund Page 5 Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities training) or are minimal, as in the case of the public contact. The District’s non - maintenance operations would bring a different set of issues to the Center, with parents, young people and other members of the public on site. It could result in difficult situations with respect to circulation and other conditions that would not be easily reconciled. •Having two agencies on one site will involve management issues and it will be important for there to be clarity about who is in charge of the center and who makes decisions when an issue arises. •The City has several departments utilizing the center now, and their interests should also be considered as to how the site will work with new functions should the District be located there. •The management team of both the District and City representing the operations involved will need to invest significant time working through many issues. This effort will need to be factored into their regular workload and is the feasibility of doing so will need to be determined. •An extensive public process regarding expanding operations on the existing site is likely, given interests of the adjacent residential development. Sixteen Issues for Consideration Each of the 16 issues is addressed below. 1.Which functions are appropriate for co-location at the Operations Services Center? The predominant function at the Operations Services Center is that of maintenance and operations, with police and fire training functions on site. The City has some public -facing services, but they are limited. The School District’s functions proposed to be moved are broader in scope than exists on the Operations Services Center Site. The functions other than maintenance or operations for both entities are shown in Table 2 below. Table 2. Non-Maintenance or Operations Functions Located at Each Site Now City of Pleasanton Pleasanton Unified School District •Utility billing and related administrative functions •Dog licensing •Environmental services •Water quality laboratory •Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department training facility and tower •Police Department gun range and storage •Use of Remillard Conference Room •Administration function for Kid’s Club •Purchasing operation •Mail room •Graphics shop •Data processing •Computer lab •Warehouse Both parties would need to agree on what operations are appropriate and feasible to be located at the City’s Operations Services Center. City staff expressed interest in limiting any co-location to maintenance functions only. District staff noted they would need to examine the functions further to determine which should be proposed for relocation.