My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
051325 SPECIAL
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 2:52:49 PM
Creation date
5/14/2025 10:07:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Nelson Fialho/Mr. David Haglund Page 23 <br />Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities <br /> <br />allocation and delegated responsibility. He explained that each agency’s needs have been <br />accommodated over time. They currently share office space and locker rooms and sharing of <br />outdoor spaces has also evolved informally over the years, although he noted that he has kept a <br />paper trail of arrangements that have been entered into among users without formally <br />amending the agreement. <br /> <br />One area Mr. Barry thought the agreement was lacking in is cost sharing for capital <br />improvements. As the facilities age, regular maintenance will need to be supplemented with <br />occasional capital investment and those projects will have to be discussed and ne gotiated as <br />they occur. <br /> <br />Mr. Barry noted that the cost sharing arrangement works well, as long as each agency keeps the <br />other informed when cost increases are anticipated. Because each agency makes independent <br />decisions about spending on activities subject to reimbursement, communication during and <br />after that decision-making process is key to maintaining a positive relationship. <br /> <br />As anticipated in the Joint Use Agreement, the City and LARPD maintain separate operations at <br />the Maintenance Service Center. On occasion they have discussed combining certain functions, <br />such as fleet maintenance, but it was felt that priorities may not always align in a way that <br />would meet the needs of both organizations. For example, the City maintains police vehicles <br />and LARPD was concerned that if resources had to be assigned to service patrol vehicles or <br />school buses, it would likely (and perhaps rightly) be the public safety vehicles that were <br />prioritized. <br /> <br />In summary, Mr. Barry felt the long -standing partnership worked well and was very beneficial <br />for both agencies. <br /> <br />Source: City of Livermore administrative record; LARPD administrative record; interview with Tim <br />Barry, General Manager of LARPD <br /> <br />Emails to City of Livermore Public Works Maintenance Manager were not answered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.