CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Nelson Fialho/Mr. David Haglund Page 27 Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities In the summer of 2009, the District was in the process of developing a comprehensive, district - wide facilities plan (bond issue) that, if approved, would have impacted every school district building, including their vehicle maintenance building. The feasib ility study was put on hold until after the bond vote. The ballot measure failed in December 2009 and failed again in March of 2010. The District then decided to scale back the size of the facilities plan and a new fleet maintenance facility was eliminated. Nevertheless, in the spring of 2010 the District and City formed a Joint Fleet Management Facility Committee (Committee) and gave the Committee the responsibility of moving the study forward. Hunt Engineers & Architects was retained to complete the study, which was published in March 2012. The feasibility study included the following action plan: • Evaluate the existing buildings of both entities to determine if either building would be a good “candidate” for a building expansion. • If both buildings were determined to be inadequate for expansion, provide a conceptual design of a facility that would be large enough to accommodate the needs of both entities. • Perform site evaluations for a new building, including the existing two sites and other sites in the immediate Corning area. • Review staffing needs to determine if the fleet maintenance workload of the two entities could be accommodated by combining and possibly reducing staff to save costs. • Calculate cost savings of a new, shared fleet maintenance facility when compared with constructing and operating two separate new facilities. The study found that neither existing site was suitable for expansion. Two conceptual plans were developed for a shared facility and four sites were studied as possible locations (three owned by the City and one by the local utility company). Staffing leve ls at both City and District were found to be adequate but not sufficient in size to warrant combining and reducing staff to save costs. The Committee identified a preferred plan and location, with an estimated price tag of $5.9 million. The study also found that in addition to the benefits of having sufficient space and an upgraded facility for fleet maintenance, the co-location project would benefit both City and District by allowing joint purchasing of parts and supplies, and joint operation and use of a fueling station. The Committee identified a source of state funding typically earmarked to help fund school facilities projects. However, it also acknowledged that The current fiscal crisis within the State of New York will likely impact state aid to both the city and school district. With that in mind the committee realizes that, even though a shared fleet maintenance facility would, over the long term, be a savings to taxpayers (vs. new individual facilities) the implementation of the plan in the immediate future is unlikely.