My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2025030
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2025
>
RES 2025030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2025 10:34:44 AM
Creation date
7/7/2025 9:53:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 2025-030
DOCUMENT NAME
BONDE RANCH
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Landscape Maintenance District No. 1993-2, Bonde Ranch Engineer’s Report, Fiscal Year 2025-26 <br />parcel creation. Since these adjacent properties only receive a 3 of the 5 major <br />special benefits, a 60% factor is applied. <br /> <br />Total General Benefit to Properties Outside of the District = 3.3 % <br /> <br />Assumptions <br />6 parcels outside and adjacent to the District <br />103 parcels in the Maintenance District <br /> <br />Calculation <br />General Benefit to Property outside the Improvement District = <br />(6 / (6 + 103)) * 60% = 3.3 % <br /> <br />Although it can reasonably be argued that Improvements inside, but near the <br />Maintenance District boundaries are offset by similar landscape improvements <br />provided outside, we use the more generous approach of finding that 3.3% of the <br />Improvements may be of benefit to property outside of the Maintenance District. <br /> <br />Benefit to Property Inside the District that is Indirect and Derivative = 0.0% <br />The “indirect and derivative” benefit to property within the Maintenance District is <br />particularly difficult to calculate. A solid argument can be presented that all <br />benefit within the Maintenance District is special because the Improvements are <br />clearly “over and above” and “particular and distinct” when compared with the <br />unique proximity, access and views of the Improvements enjoyed by benefiting <br />properties in the Maintenance District. <br /> <br />Nevertheless, the SVTA decision indicates that there may be a general benefit <br />“conferred on real property located in the district.” A measure of the general <br />benefits to property within the Maintenance District is the percentage of land area <br />within the Maintenance District that is publicly owned, open to the public, a nd <br />used for regional purposes such as major roads, rail lines, hospitals, and other <br />regional facilities because such properties, while physically within the <br />Maintenance District, are used for regional purposes and could provide indirect <br />benefits to the public at large. In this case, essentially 0% of the land area is <br />used for such regional purposes. <br /> <br />Benefit to the Public at Large = 10% <br />The general benefit to the public at large can be estimated by the proportionate <br />amount of time that the Maintenance District’s public landscaped areas and <br />facilities are used and enjoyed by individuals who are not residents, employees, <br />customers, or property owners in the Assessment Area. Based on surveys and <br />research in which visitors to similar landscape, open space and parks, at various <br />times of the day, evening, and week, were asked to look at a District map and to <br />identify whether they lived or worked within the City, less than 5% of the use of <br />similar landscape, open space, parks or recreation areas is by the public at large.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.