My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
060325 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2025 11:40:48 AM
Creation date
7/15/2025 11:39:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT 2025 Legislative Positions <br /> <br />9 | P a g e <br />Updated 4.21.2025 <br />17 SB 634 (Perez <br /> <br />Homelessness: civil <br />and criminal <br />penalties <br />This bill would prohibit a local jurisdiction from adopting a local <br />ordinance, or enforcing an existing ordinance, that imposes <br />civil or criminal penalties on a person who is homeless for any <br />act immediately related to homelessness or any act related to <br />basic survival, or on a person who is assisting a person who is <br />homeless with any act related to basic survival. The bill would <br />similarly prohibit a state agency from adopting any regulation <br />or issuing any policy or guidance, or enforcing an existing <br />regulation, policy, or guidance, that imposes those civil or <br />criminal penalties. <br /> <br />Oppose None/Oppose <br />18 SB 707 (Durazo) <br /> <br />Open meetings: <br />meeting and <br />teleconference <br />requirements <br />This bill seeks to revise and recast the alternative <br />teleconferencing provisions to apply specified noticing, <br />accessibility, and public commenting requirements in a <br />uniform manner and makes various other changes to the <br />Brown Act with the goal of enhancing public participation. This <br />bill would revise and recasts existing alternative <br />teleconferencing provisions, until January 1, 2030, by <br />providing a standard set of requirements that must be <br />complied with. The bill would also authorize, until January 1, <br />2030, alternative teleconferencing provisions for an eligible <br />subsidiary body, as defined. The bill would authorize, until <br />January 1, 2030, alternative teleconferencing provisions for <br />eligible multijurisdictional bodies that include representatives <br />from more than one city, county, special district, or joint <br />powers authority. <br /> <br />Support if <br />Amended <br /> <br />The bill contains <br />several positive <br />provisions, <br />including those <br />impacting multi- <br />jurisdictional <br />entities; however, <br />there are areas of <br />concerns, such as <br />language <br />translation <br />requirements, that <br />could increase city <br />workload and <br />costs. <br /> <br />None/Concerns <br /> <br />Page 34 of 226
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.