My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2025047
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2025
>
RES 2025047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2025 3:50:18 PM
Creation date
7/28/2025 2:46:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 2025-047
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Introduction <br />Executive Summary <br />The Moller Ranch Landscape Maintenance District, 1995-1, was created in 1995 as a <br />means to fund the maintenance of the designated landscaped and open space areas, <br />and common area features for the 101 parcel Moller Ranch subdivision. The district was <br />formed prior to the passage of Proposition 218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which <br />requires property owner approval to impose or increase assessments. <br />When the district was formed, an inflation escalator was built into the assessment with a <br />maximum assessment at the time of $1,000 per parcel annually. However, the inflation <br />escalator has not been applied and assessments have remained the same since they <br />were last lowered in FY 1999-2000 to $560.53. The equivalent of the 2000 assessment <br />of $560.53 in today's dollars, based on the Consumer Price Index for California, is <br />$1,137.53. The reduced assessment has led to a severe decline in the level of <br />maintenance, a lack of sufficient funding for capital improvement projects, and forced <br />the city to shut down a portion of the irrigation system. The lack of irrigation has led to <br />an even further decline of the landscape. The district is now out of compliance with the <br />level of maintenance required as part of the development approval, which exposes the <br />district and the property owners to increased liability. <br />Over the years, staff has had discussions with the HOA about a potential increase in <br />assessment rates to achieve a sustainable maintenance level but has yet to actually <br />increase assessments. It wasn't until the city conducted research this year that staff <br />determined that an assessment of up to $1,000 with an inflation escalator was approved <br />at the time that the district was formed. Staff is recommending that the assessment be <br />restored to the 1997 level of $675.63, the first year after Proposition 218 went into <br />effect. The restoration of the post -Proposition 218 assessment amount is only a first <br />step though, as maintenance costs are estimated to be closer to $1,000 annually to <br />properly maintain the district and complete the necessary improvements, such as tree <br />pruning, irrigation replacement, turf conversions, and lighting replacement and <br />upgrades. The budget for this fiscal year will require drawing down the reserve by <br />around $24,000 due to the consultant costs, estimated at approximately $9,000, and <br />planned maintenance improvements, estimated at $30,000, but future stepped <br />assessment increases are expected to place the district in a fiscally sustainable <br />position. <br />Overview <br />The City of Pleasanton ("City") is located in Alameda County, and covers an area of <br />24.3 square miles, with over 24,500 assessor parcels, and approximately 80,000 <br />residents. The City currently has five Landscape Maintenance Districts ("Districts") that <br />provide services to a combined total of 680 parcels: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.