Laserfiche WebLink
i. <br />L <br />L <br />L <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Sole Source Justification <br />Sole source purchases are goods and services available from only one supplier/vendor or meet s the listed criteria. Purchases for item s that cann ot be <br />procured through the compet itive bidding process must be documented as to why the item(s) is consi dered sole source. <br />I Requester Name : Jeremy Cox <br />Requested Sole Source Company: Akel EngineerinQ <br />Contact Name: Tony Akel <br />!Title: Utilities Divsion Manager <br />I Email: takel@akeleng.com <br />Address:7433 North 1st Street, Suite 103, Fresno, CA 93720 <br />!Dept: Public Works <br />I Phone: 559-436-0600 <br />Complete the followina checklist· This is a sole source vendor because· <br />Sole provider of a licensed or patented good or service. <br />Sole provider of items that are repair parts of or updates to existing equipment, systems. <br />Sole provider of factory-authorized warranty service. <br />Description of Product or Service: <br />Akel Engineering has developed the City's hydraulic water model under a separate contract. This maintenance contract is necessary to <br />update the model due to new developments/connections, as well as provide short term modeling assistance as required by the City. <br />Project Schedule (when do you need the product or service by?): As needed over next 2 years !Estimated Cost:$ 99,999.00 <br />Sole provider of unique equipment, products and/or services not offered by others. Please provide brief explanation. <br />As the original developer of the hydraulic model, Akel is uniquely qualified to assure that revisions to the model are done properly. In addition, <br />since the City does not have engineers who are experienced at running modeling scenarios, Akel can run them efficiently with greater <br />accuracy. <br />Only company available to provide service and/or supplies to meet project schedule. In a brief explanation, provide supporting evidence of <br />why other contractors are considered to be unable to meet the project schedule. <br />There is a substantial technical risk in contracting with any other contractor, (e.g., only one contractor has been successful to date in <br />implementing a difficult manufacturing process). In a brief explanation, provide supporting evidence that explains why other contractors are <br />considered to be unable to overcome the substantial technical risk. <br />There is no reasonable expectation that a meaningful cost or other improvement could be realized over the Incumbent contractor's <br />performance (e.g., the changes of another firm winning a competition are clearly remote. Please provide a brief explanation. <br />What steps were taken to verify that these features are not available elsewhere? <br />Other brands/manufacturers/companies were examined (List specific company names, phone number and contact names, and explain why <br />these were not suitable). <br />Other vendors were contacted (List specific company names, phone numbers and contact names, and explain why these were not suitable). <br />What specific feature makes this item and/or company unique and why is this needed for your project? <br />Akel developed the original model and understands the assumptions and logic used in its development. <br />Requestors Signature: Date: <br />Department Head Signature: Date: <br />Director of Finance Approval: Date: <br />Docusign Envelope ID: C46C441F-9A82-4B56-A63E-5EFFFA7B052C <br />6/25/2025 <br />7/25/2025