My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
061725 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2025 4:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/13/2025 11:02:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />C. Unless given prior approval from the Director of Community Development <br />installation of public art shall be on or within the project site. <br />§13.20.060 Approval Process. <br />A. Application. An applicant seeking approval of a project subject to the <br />requirements of this chapter shall submit a public art application, as established by the city <br />council, to the planning department, generally at the same time as the application for planning <br />approval, or in instances where no planning approval is required, at the time of building permit. <br />The application will include the preliminary construction and alteration cost of the project, a <br />description of the proposed public art, budget for design, fabrication, transportation, and <br />installation, resume of the artist, and a maintenance program and budget. <br />B. Review. <br />1. Public art applications associated with Applications for Housing <br />Accountability Act projects shall be reviewed by the Director for conformance with the <br />criteria set forth in section 13.20.050 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code. Approval of the <br />public art proposal by the Director may be reflected as a Condition of Approval of the <br />residential project, and, to the extent the approved public art proposal would modify <br />physical elements of the underlying project, such revisions shall be processed as an <br />administrative amendment and not require additional discretionary project review and <br />approval, with the Director's decision considered final. <br />2. All other applications shall be reviewed by the Commission. In reviewing <br />applications, the Commission shall consider the following criteria: <br />a. Quality. The foremost consideration will be the quality of the <br />proposed artwork as assessed by the critical review of the Commission. The <br />reputation and/or promise of the artist may also be key considerations. <br />b. Relationship to the collection and to the community. The proposed <br />artwork will be analyzed for its potential relationship to the city's present <br />collection and the requirements of this chapter. <br />C. Compatibility. Conceptual compatibility and appropriateness of the <br />proposed artwork to the surrounding built and/or natural environment will be <br />factors for consideration, and will include scale, form, content, and design. <br />d. Materials, fabrication and installation. The Commission shall <br />evaluate the existing artwork's material or the artist's proposed materials and their <br />appropriateness as regards to structural and surface integrity, protection against <br />theft, vandalism, public safety, weathering, and an analysis of long-term <br />maintenance needs. The Commission will also evaluate the proposed method of <br />installation and an evaluation of safety and structural factors involved in the <br />installation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.