My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
071525 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 11:12:32 AM
Creation date
8/13/2025 11:08:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Consolidated Plan CITY OF PLEASANTON 57 <br /> OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) <br /> <br />AP‐50 Geographic Distribution ‐ 91.420, 91.220(f) <br />Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low‐income and <br />minority concentration) where assistance will be directed <br /> <br />The City of Pleasanton receives an allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, <br />which may be used for eligible activities, eligible households, and/or eligible areas within its jurisdiction. <br />The CDBG funds are allocated according to a formula based on population data from the 2010 Census <br />and the number of substandard units in each jurisdiction. All projects listed in the “Proposed Projects” <br />tables are intended and open to serve eligible households within the City of Pleasanton. Census tracts <br />that are located completely or partially within the current Pleasanton city limits are as follows: 4506.01, <br />4506.02, 4506.03, 4506.04, 4506.05, 4506.06, 4506.07, 4506.43, 4506.46, 4507.01, 4507.41, 4507.42, <br />4507.44, and 4507.45. <br /> <br />Geographic Distribution <br />Target Area Percentage of Funds <br />Citywide 100 <br />Table 21 ‐ Geographic Distribution <br /> <br />Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically <br /> <br />Geography was not used to determine funding allocation priorities. <br />Page 221 of 694
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.