Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Date: February 14, 2025 <br /> <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />From: Gerry Beaudin, City Manager <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br /> <br />Subject: February 18, 2025, Agenda Item No. 9: Receive updates on residential <br />development proposals on two properties in East Pleasanton outside the City <br />Limits <br /> <br /> <br />At its February 4, 2025, regular meeting, the above-referenced item was continued to the City <br />Council’s meeting on February 18, 2025. This supplemental memo addresses City Council <br />questions received after the February 4 meeting. <br /> <br />1: Traffic Report – Does the traffic report include analysis/information for the East Lakes <br />project as both an age-restricted and not age-restricted project? <br />The traffic analysis was started in mid-December and includes 14 model runs. The modeling <br />was already underway when staff were informed of the possible alternative housing types. <br />Instead of altering the modeling assumptions, staff elected to retain the senior housing (age- <br />restricted) assumption and evaluate any changes in housing type after the modeling was <br />completed. The modeling data shows a four-lane El Charro Road is necessary prior to any <br />development of East Lakes; any intensification of trip generation would adjust the cost sharing <br />percentages but not the timing of the roadway. <br /> <br />2: Has Pleasanton Unified School District (PUSD) taken a position on the project(s)? <br />No, to date the PUSD board or staff have not taken a formal position on the project(s). <br /> <br />2.a: Does PUSD have capacity in the school system? <br />Staff discussed the proposed preliminary projects with PUSD. School district staff indicated <br />that, due to declining enrollment, the school district expects to have sufficient capacity for <br />additional students generated from the projects. Residential development in East Pleasanton <br />could, however, create challenges for elementary school boundaries due to projected future <br />enrollment at individual schools. Mohr Elementary School would have the greatest capacity to <br />absorb students from new East Pleasanton development, however, improved vehicle and <br />bicycle/pedestrian connections from East Pleasanton to Mohr Elementary School would be <br />necessary to provide convenient school access while minimizing traffic impacts. <br /> <br />2.b: Does the City have concerns about traffic impacts from more students at schools? <br />City and PUSD staff work together frequently to address school congestion issues. Traffic <br />to/from school sites is not specifically analyzed when evaluating a development project; an