My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
021825 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 12:05:26 PM
Creation date
8/13/2025 12:01:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
479
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Tassano January 31, 2025 <br />Page 6 of 37 <br />The Bernal Avenue (between Sunol Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue) and Stanley Boulevard <br />(between Bernal Avenue and Isabel Avenue) routes were also analyzed to understand how the <br />redistribution of traffic might affect them. In the case of Bernal Avenue, the data suggests the <br />extension potentially attracts traffic to this road given the top origins and destinations of trips <br />using this route. This effect is present in both directions and peak hours, although it is more <br />pronounced during the PM peak hour. On the other hand, the extension also potentially adds <br />trips coming from the Livermore area to Stanley Boulevard. This happens mostly in the <br />westbound direction during the AM peak hour, and in the eastbound direction during the PM <br />peak hour. <br />Another interesting Pleasanton travel pattern analysis aspect is the cut-through traffic using local <br />streets trying to avoid the I-680/I-580 interchange during the AM and PM peak hours. Cut- <br />through traffic is defined as traffic that passes through a city and has neither an origin nor <br />destination inside of it. StreetLight data was used to quantify the cut-through traffic through <br />Pleasanton given that a new north-south roadway like the proposed El Charro Road extension <br />could also attract cut-through traffic. This analysis focused on traffic going from east to south in <br />the AM peak hour, and from south to east in the PM peak hour. <br />Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the existing freeway traffic cutting through Pleasanton as a <br />proportion of the vehicles traveling from I-580 at Isabel Avenue to I-680 at Sunol Boulevard, and <br />vice versa, respectively. These proportions show that around 30% of vehicles going from I-580 at <br />Isabel Avenue to I-680 at Sunol Boulevard during the AM peak hour cut through Pleasanton using <br />local roads. During the PM peak hour, the proportion of traffic cutting through local roads in the <br />reverse direction is 15%. Furthermore, the cut-through traffic represents between 10% and 15% of <br />the total traffic on Sunol Boulevard. Since cut-through traffic exists on Pleasanton roadways <br />today, it is expected that some of the traffic on El Charro Road will be cut-through traffic in <br />the future. <br />The Alameda CTC travel demand model projects that around 15% of the El Charro Road traffic <br />would be regional traffic, meaning that at least one of the ends of those trips would be outside of <br />Pleasanton or its adjacent cities (Dublin and Livermore). A portion of this traffic would be <br />expected to be cut-through traffic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.