My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2025054
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2025
>
RES 2025054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 4:05:15 PM
Creation date
9/25/2025 1:49:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/16/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
2025-054
DOCUMENT NAME
URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN, CIP 22773
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
494
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATUS OF THE URBAN FOREST (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TREES) <br />Tree condition of the City's inventory varied, with roughly <br />12% rated as good, and 83% as fair, and 4% rated poor, <br />critical, or dead. The most common health defects observed <br />in these trees included drought stress, decay, and poor root <br />function, and various pest and pathogen problems. The <br />most common structure defects included cavities, dead <br />limbs or branches, leaning, topping, and issues with branch <br />unions and root systems. Table 2-11 shows that the relative <br />distribution of the various tree conditions is mostly the same <br />for all age categories. The only exception to this is that <br />immature age trees (the trees that have been most recently <br />planted by the City) have the highest relative percentage of <br />trees in `good' condition at 22% (compared to 7% and 9% for <br />the other age categories) and the lowest relative percentage <br />of trees in `fair' condition at 73% (compared to 83%, 87%, <br />and 88% for the other age categories). This distribution of <br />conditions makes sense for immature trees as 1) they should <br />be starting in a good condition coming straight from the tree <br />nursery, and 2) they haven't developed mature canopies that <br />might have more obvious structural issues or outgrown their <br />planting spaces. Mortality of these immature trees is likely <br />between 1 and 5% depending on how many of these trees in <br />the `critical' and `poor' categories survive to maturity. <br />Table 2-10. Tree Conditions of the Pleasanton Inventory <br />.M. IF Number of TreesPercent <br />Good <br />2,934 <br />12.4% <br />Fair <br />19,642 <br />82.8% <br />Poor <br />803 <br />3.4% <br />Critical <br />io8 <br />0.5% <br />Dead <br />159 <br />0.7% <br />Source: City of Pleasanton Tree Inventory (Dudek 2024) <br />134 1 CITY OF PLEASANTON URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.