Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In general, stakeholders expressed interest and support for the EPPF project as an effort to <br />provide more clear policy guidance for the area. Stakeholders had questions about the project <br />purpose, process, and schedule, CEQA review, and the relationship with pending development <br />applications in East Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Stakeholders asked about the relationship of the more broadly defined study area to the existing <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan Area, and queried whether the City still intended to prepare a <br />Specific Plan in the future. Topics of interest included potential changes to the Urban Growth <br />Boundary, infrastructure to serve new development, and the financing of new infrastructure. <br /> <br />Noteworthy information shared by stakeholders included the following: <br />• Seefried, the owner of the Villages at the Quarry project, would prefer for i ts site to be <br />excluded from the Specific Plan area/study areas, since its project is fully entitled. <br />• East Bay Regional Park District is updating its master plan and may address the Chain <br />of Lakes . <br />• Land outside of Urban Growth Boundary is designated by MTC as a Priority <br />Conservation Area. <br />• Livermore General Plan Update will be published in the fall of 2025. May include policies <br />about future of East Pleasanton area. <br />• Zone 7 and gravel operators are considering adjustments to Chain of Lakes <br />configuration <br />• Zone 7 Flood Management Plan may include flood control projects that could impact <br />Chain of Lakes concept. The District continues to have safety and water quality <br />concerns with respect to public access at the lakes, noting steep and unstable banks, <br />and need to protect the drinking water supply. <br />• Pleasanton Gravel Company is exploring different long-term options for its properties, <br />as they transition from active mining over the coming years <br />• Schedule to complete mining operations is uncertain with operations at various states of <br />active use or transition to non-mining uses., <br />• Facilities at the OSC are important to LPFD and to the Police Departments. The Fire <br />Training tower, in particular, is a uniquely beneficial facility for the eastern part of the <br />County. Both Departments noted that existing indoor training and meeting space, and <br />storage space does not meet current needs. <br />• PGS desires to continue to operate the existing franchise, and is concerned about new <br />development impinging on its ability to operate. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 39 of 91