CITY COUNCIL & PC JOINT WORKSHOP AGENDA PACKET

Page 5 of 14 policy questions. After receiving City Council direction on preferred policy options at a future meeting, City staff will draft General Plan amendments for review and adoption. Staff expects to complete the EPPF by May 2026. Public Engagement The City will use Planning Commission and City Council meetings as the primary venue to receive public input on the EPPF project. The EPPF scope also includes consultant budget reserved for additional community engagement to be used for a community workshop, on-line materials, or other methods as needed to achieve project objectives. Project information, including draft materials, will be made available on the City’s website. Staff will maintain a list of interested persons to share announcements and communicate information about the project. The City will also convene meetings to discuss the project with property owners, public agencies, and other key stakeholders. Work Completed The first EPPF project task was to review background materials and prepare background information maps. Attachment 1 contains background information maps created for the EPPF project and assembles other relevant maps found in existing documents. Attachment 1 also contains links to background documents relevant to the EPPF project, including City of Pleasanton documents and documents prepared by other agencies. Based on the review of background information, staff prepared a preliminary list of issues to consider for the EPPF project (Attachment 3). This list was shared with project stakeholders and was used as a starting point to identify the key policy questions discussed in this staff report. Key findings and observations from the review of background materials are presented in the Discussion section, below, organized around key topic areas. In addition to review of background information, in June through August, 2025 staff met with project stakeholders to introduce the EPPF, review relevant background information, and receive preliminary input on project issues. Stakeholders were organized into the following groups: • Landowner/developers (Steelwave/USL, Amazon, Seefried) • Parks and open space agencies (East Bay Regional Park District) • Neighboring jurisdictions (Livermore, Alameda County) • Public health and resource agencies (Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, Dublin San Ramon Services District) • Gravel operators (Pleasanton Gravel) • Public service providers (Schools, Police, Fire) • Pleasanton Garbage Service • Zone 7 Water Agency At the meetings, participants were most interested in learning about City goals for the EPPF project and its overall scope. For some stakeholders, there was considerable interest in the current active development applications, and what the development of these sites might mean for adjacent properties or nearby facilities such as the Chain of Lakes. Participants also provided insight into any relevant current or past planning efforts, and shared specific concerns Page 6 of 91