CITY COUNCIL & PC JOINT WORKSHOP AGENDA PACKET

Page 8 of 14 range of potential allowed land uses for this area. The portion of the EPPF study area within Pleasanton city limits is zoned General Industrial (GI). Pleasanton's zoning for the area is generally consistent with the General Plan, although areas outside of city limits have no Pleasanton zoning. See Figure 7 in Attachment 1. • Alameda County: Alameda County zoning applies to unincorporated portions of the study area. As shown in Figure 8 in Attachment 1, most of the study area is zoned Water Management (WM) or Large Parcel Agriculture (LPA). The site of the proposed Arroyo Lago project on the western edge of the study area is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) • City of Livermore: As shown in Figure 9 in Attachment 1, the Livermore General Plan designates much of the EPPF study area as Sand and Gravel (OSP/S&G), with approximately 80 acres northeast of Lake H designated as Limited Agriculture (LDAG). Areas south of the airport and immediately adjacent to the study area boundary are designated Low Intensity Industrial (LII). The City of Livermore is in the process of developing an update to its General Plan; recently-published Draft Land Use Maps for the Livermore General Plan Update show no changes to these existing designations. As the City Council is aware, Livermore recently processed SOI amendments and annexation applications for two properties outside their City limit; SMP-39 and SMP-40 (see Figure 3 in Attachment 1). The area known as SMP-38 (west of SMP 40) remains within Pleasanton’s SOI, and there are no current plans or proposals for it to be considered for annexation into Livermore. Future Use Discussion Sites As discussed above, the EPPF project will not consider land use options for properties in the study area with proposed or approved projects, since those uses are either vested, or will be decided in conjunction with the active development applications. Excluding these areas, there are six additional areas (see Figure 10 in Attachment 1) where the City may wish to consider future land use options as part of the EPPF project. Recommended Policy Questions Staff recommends that the EPPF project explore the following policy questions related to land uses: • What is the preferred range of future land uses in the EPPF study area? • What are the preferred land uses, including development and open space uses, for specific areas? • Should existing allowed uses, as established by the General Plan and Zoning Code, change? Open Space and Recreation General Plan Community Separators The General Plan land use map designates Lake I, Lake H, and Cope Lake as water management and recreation, and states that “these water areas act as community separators on the east edge of Pleasanton where no significant development is allowed.” General Plan Subregional Planning Element Policy 13 calls for the City to “enhance community identity Page 9 of 91