My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_DEIR
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
_DEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
586
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Biological Resources <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3.3-17 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-03 Bio Resources.docx <br />(all surface and subsurface waters) to file a report of waste discharge. The discharge of dredged or <br />fill material may constitute a discharge of waste that could affect the quality of waters of the State. <br />Historically, California relied on its authority under Section 401 of the CWA to regulate discharges of <br />dredged or fill material to California waters, which requires an applicant to obtain “water quality <br />certification” from the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) through one of its <br />nine RWQCBs to ensure compliance with State water quality standards before certain federal <br />licenses or permits may be issued. The permits subject to Section 401 include permits for the <br />discharge of dredged or fill material (CWA Section 404 permits) issued by the USACE. Waste <br />discharge requirements under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act were typically waived <br />for projects requiring certification. With the recent changes that limited the jurisdiction of wetlands <br />under the CWA, the State Water Board has needed to rely on the report of the waste discharge <br />process. <br />California Native Plant Society <br />The CNPS maintains a rank of plant species native to California that has low population numbers, <br />limited distribution, or are otherwise threatened with extinction. This information is published in the <br />Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Potential impacts to populations of <br />CNPS ranked plants receive consideration under CEQA review. The following identifies the definitions <br />of the CNPS ranks: <br />• Rank 1A: Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere <br />• Rank 1B: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere <br />• Rank 2A: Plants presumed extirpated in California but common elsewhere <br />• Rank 2B: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more numerous elsewhere <br />• Rank 3: Plants about which more information is needed <br />• Rank 4: Watch List: Plants of limited distribution <br /> <br />Potential impacts to populations of California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) ranked plants receive <br />consideration under CEQA review. All plants appearing on the CNPS List ranked 1 or 2 are considered <br />to meet the CEQA Guidelines Section 15380 criteria. Rank 3 and 4 plants do not automatically meet <br />this definition. Rank 4 plants do not clearly meet CEQA standards and thresholds for impact <br />considerations. Nevertheless, some level of CEQA review is justified for CRPR 4 taxa, and under some <br />circumstances, a full impact analysis is warranted. Taxa that can be shown to meet the criteria for <br />endangered, rare, or threatened status under CEQA Section 15380(d) or that can be shown to be <br />regionally rare or unique as defined in CEQA Section 15125(c) must be fully analyzed in a CEQA <br />document. Some circumstances, such as local rarity, having occurrences peripheral to the taxon’s <br />distribution, or having occurrences on unusual substrates or rare and declining habitats, provide <br />justification for treating some CRPR 4 taxa occurrences as regionally rare or unique. One limitation to <br />fully analyzing impacts on CRPR 4 taxa is the difficulty in obtaining current data on the number and <br />condition of the occurrences.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.