Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3.7-13 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-07 GHG.docx <br />local actions to reduce GHG emissions, enhance environmental sustainability, and prepare for <br />climate change.8 <br />To assess the proposed project’s generation of GHG emissions and their potential to cause a <br />significant impact, the proposed project is analyzed for its consistency with the City’s CAP 2.0. In <br />regard to demonstrating project consistency with applicable GHG plans, the proposed project must <br />be consistent with a local GHG reduction strategy (BAAQMD Threshold B) or meet the minimum <br />project design elements recommended by BAAQMD (BAAQMD Threshold A). Threshold B is being <br />applied to the analysis of this project as the City has adopted a qualified CAP that includes a CAP <br />Consistency Checklist. <br />Construction <br />GHG emissions associated with construction were computed at 1,262.46 MT CO2e for the total <br />construction period. These are the emissions from on-site operation of equipment for demolition, <br />site preparation (such as grading), vendor and hauling truck trips, and worker trips. Neither the City <br />nor BAAQMD have an adopted threshold of significance for construction-related GHG emissions, <br />though the OPR recommends quantifying emissions and disclosing that GHG emissions would occur <br />during construction, even in cases where BAAQMD does not. GHG emissions associated with <br />development of the proposed project would occur over the short-term from construction activities, <br />consisting primarily of emissions from equipment exhaust and worker and vendor trips. Therefore, <br />the construction GHG emissions would have a less than significant impact and would not conflict <br />with any GHG plans or policies. <br />Operation <br />The proposed project would be associated with long-term operational emissions from vehicular <br />traffic within the project vicinity, energy and water usage, and solid waste disposal. <br />As stated, to assess operational-related GHG emissions and their potential to cause a significant <br />impact, the proposed project is analyzed for its consistency with the City’s CAP 2.0. The CAP 2.0 <br />Checklist sets forth several strategies for GHG reductions across areas including energy, waste, and <br />water. The proposed project will be subject to and will comply with the requirements generally <br />applicable to new construction and covered projects (which includes new residential construction), <br />accounting for economic and technological feasibility considerations as allowed by CAP 2.0. As noted <br />in the CAP 2.0 Checklist, a completed copy of the Checklist is required to accompany discretionary <br />application submittals and is available in Appendix A. Some examples of GHG reduction measures <br />consistent with CAP 2.0 are presented below: <br />Green Building Standards <br />• The proposed project will comply with the latest version of mandatory measures in the <br />CALGreen Code. <br />• The proposed project will comply with the Pleasanton Municipal Code Chapter 17.50. <br /> <br />8 City of Pleasanton. 2022. Climate Action Plan. Website: https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/our-government/key- <br />initiatives/climate-action-plan/. Accessed March 6, 2025.