My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Appendix C - Biological Resources Supporting Information COMBINED
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
Appendix C - Biological Resources Supporting Information COMBINED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:57:46 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:56:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain <br />findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its <br />adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: <br />D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL <br />THAT APPLY): <br />D 1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area: <br />D TNWs: linear feet width (ft), and/or acres. <br />D Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres. <br />~ 2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br />D Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating <br />that tributary is perennial: <br />[8J Tributaries ofTNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are <br />jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows <br />seasonally: Water was observed flowing in both onsite RPWs during surveys in April and May 2014 and during the June <br />2016 site visit. Both have a defined bed and bank, are represented as USGS blue line streams, and are hydrologically <br />connected to a traditional navigable water, the SF Bay, as they flow into Dublin Creek, whch drains into San Francisco <br />Bay via South San Ramon Creek and Alameda Creek. <br />Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply) <br />[8J Tributary waters: 6098 linear feet width (ft). <br />D Other non-wetland waters: acres. <br />Identify type(s) of waters: <br />~ 3. Non-RPWs 9 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br />[8J Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a <br />TN W is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. <br />Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply): <br />[8J Tributary waters: 94 linear feet width (ft). <br />D Other non-wetland waters: acres. <br />Identify type(s) of waters: <br />D 4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br />D Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands. <br />D Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale <br />indicating that tributary is perennial in Section 111.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly <br />abutting an RPW: <br />D Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that <br />tributary is seasonal in Section 111.B and rationale in Section 111.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that <br />wetland is directly abutting an RPW: <br />Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. <br />D 5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br />D Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are <br />adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data <br />supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.C. <br />Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. <br />D 6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br />9S ee Footnote # 3. <br />ud080207 Wt-'£> 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.