Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />3 <br />BACKGROUND <br />This analysis was prepared in accordance with the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) <br />Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (2018) and follows the guidance <br />established in the City of Pleasanton’s 2023–2031 Housing Element Draft and Final Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIR). VMT estimates were generated using the Alameda County Transportation <br />Commission (ACTC) Countywide Travel Demand Model, a regional four-step model calibrated to pre- <br />pandemic (2020) conditions and consistent with Plan Bay Area 2040 assumptions. The model was used <br />to estimate Residential VMT per capita for the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) encompassing the proposed <br />Hidden Canyon Residences & Preserve project (TAZ #1190) under both Baseline (2020) and Cumulative <br />(2040) scenarios for No Project and With Project conditions. <br />Housing Element EIR VMT Analysis <br />The Housing Element EIR concluded that VMT impacts from implementation of the Housing Element <br />would be significant and unavoidable at both the project-level and cumulative level, even after the <br />application of mitigation measures. Although the EIR disclosed that development consistent with the <br />Housing Element Update would reduce the home-based VMT per capita to an average of 22.3 miles <br />per resident by 2040, this value would still exceed the threshold of significance of 15.0 VMT per <br />resident. This threshold reflects a 15 percent reduction below the Alameda County 2040 No Project <br />average home-based VMT per capita. <br />To address these impacts, the Housing Element EIR includes Mitigation Measure (MM) TRANS-2, which <br />requires that individual housing projects not screened out from VMT analysis prepare a quantitative <br />VMT assessment consistent with the methodology used in the EIR. If the project’s VMT exceeds the <br />threshold, it must incorporate VMT reduction strategies aimed at reducing VMT. <br />However, the EIR determined that while MM TRANS-2 would reduce VMT to some extent, the <br />effectiveness of these measures in reducing project-level VMT below the significance threshold could <br />not be guaranteed. As such, VMT impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, even with the <br />implementation of MM TRANS-2 and associated mitigation measures. <br />The proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the growth assumptions and cumulative <br />impact analysis presented in the City of Pleasanton 2023–2031 Housing Element Draft and Final <br />Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The proposed project is located on Site 1 of the Pleasanton <br />Housing Element EIR’s Table 2-1: Potential Sites for Rezoning. The EIR identified this 128.5-acre parcel <br />with a maximum capacity of 31 units. The proposed project includes 30 units (28 new and 2 <br />replacement units), which is consistent with the Housing Element’s assumed buildout. As such, the <br />project is consistent with the type and intensity of residential development evaluated in the Housing <br />Element EIR, and its VMT impact has been previously disclosed at the programmatic level. <br />PROJECT SCREENING <br />Per OPR’s Technical Advisory (December 2018) and consistent with Housing Element EIR, residential <br />projects may be presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact if they meet certain screening