Appendix H - Transportation Supporting Information COMBINED

5 of the proposed project would result in a potentially significant VMT impact under Existing plus Project Conditions. Table 2: VMT per Capita (Base Year Conditions) TAZ County VMT/Capita Impact Threshold TAZ VMT per Capita under Existing Conditions TAZ VMT per Capita under Existing Plus Project Conditions 1190 19.38 16.47 35.29 34.83 Source: ACTC Model Outputs Cumulative VMT Impact Findings Since the proposed project was found to result in potentially significant VMT impacts under Existing plus Project Conditions, a cumulative analysis of project VMT was also conducted using the ACTC model. Table 3 shows the VMT per Capita associated with the proposed development under Cumulative Conditions, based on ACTC model results for TAZ #1190, which includes the proposed development. Under both Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project conditions, the VMT per Capita is higher than the significant threshold of 15.00 miles per resident. Based on the forecasted VMT per Capita of 33.26 miles per resident under Cumulative plus Project conditions, a reduction of approximately 54.91 percent would be needed to mitigate the VMT impact to less than significant levels under Cumulative plus Project conditions. Table 3: VMT per Capita (Cumulative Year Conditions) TAZ County VMT/Capita Impact Threshold TAZ VMT per Capita under Existing Conditions TAZ VMT per Capita under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions 1190 17.64 15.0 33.16 33.26 Source: ACTC Model Outputs VMT MITIGATION MEASURES When a lead agency identifies a significant CEQA impact, the agency must identify feasible mitigation measures in order to avoid or substantially reduce that impact. These measures can be incorporated as a part of plans, policies, regulations, or project designs. Project design features that encourage mode shift from automobiles to transit or non-motorized modes can therefore help reduce project VMT.