FIRST CARBON SOLUTIONS (#2026339)

i. L L LJ City of Pleasanton Sole Source Justification Sole sou rce purchases are goods and services ava ilable from only one supplier/vendor or meets the li sted criteria . Purchas es for items tha t cannot be procured through the competitive bidd ing process must be documented as to why the item (s) is cons idered sole source . !Requester Name : M egan Camp bell !Title : Plann ing & Sustaina bility Sp ecial is ti Dept: CEDD Requested So le Source Company : F i rst Carbon So lutions Contact Name :J ann a Wa l igorski I Email : j wa l izorsk i (ii),f cs-in t l.com I Phone : 530-5 I 9-9 736 Address : Descri pt ion of Product or Serv ice : CEQA se r vi ces for t he additional H ousing Element r ezo ne sites. Pro j ect Schedu le (when do you need the product or serv ice by?): E nd of 2026 I Est imated Cost:$ 9 1,303.00 Comolete the followina checklist· Th is is a sole source vendor because · Sole prov ider of a li censed or patented good or serv ice . Sole provider of items that are repair parts of or updates to existing equipment, systems . Sole provider of factory-authorized warranty serv ice . Sole provider of unique equipment , products and/or services not offered by others . Please provide brief explanation . FCS was sel ect ed as th ey we r e th e firm that comp l eted th e Ci ty's H o using El ement CEQA do cum ent. This proj ec t is an addendum l o th e CEQA do c ume nt and H ous ing E lement . Only company ava ilable to provide serv ice and /or supplies to meet project schedule . In a brief explanation, provide supporting evidence of why other contractors are considered to be unable to meet the project schedule . There is a substantial technical risk in contracting with any other contractor, (e .g ., only one contractor has been successfu l to date in implementing a difficult manufacturing process). In a brief explanation, provide supporting evidence that explains why other contractors are considered to be unable to overcome the substantial technical risk. There is no reasonable expectation that a mean ingful cost or other improvement could be real ized over the incumbent contractor's performance (e .g ., the changes of another firm winn ing a competit ion are clearly remote . Please provide a brief explanation . What steps were taken to verify that these features are not available elsewhere? Other brands/manufacturers/compan ies were examined (List specific company names, phone number and contact names, and explain why these were not suitable). Other vendors were contacted (List specific company names, phone numbers and contact names, and explain why these were not suitable). What spec ific feature makes this item and/or company un ique and why is th is needed for your project? This firm un i quely worked on t he Ci ty's H ousi ng El emen t CEQA . As su ch, they have da ta, analys is, and prior familiarity and do cum en tation on hand. The fam iliari ty w ith th e main CEQA doc um ent is the p r imary driver for con sultant se l ec tion f o r t he addendum . Requesters Signature : Date : l°'l /3 /Zo2 > Date 11--• -Z oL5 Directo r of Finance Approval : Da te : Docusign Envelope ID: 276BF274-B283-45D5-94A5-B39D73173D41 12/9/2025