My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2025-16
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
PC-2025-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2025 10:30:44 AM
Creation date
12/23/2025 10:28:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ENGEO <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> <br /> <br />5150.100.101 <br />May 2, 2008 Page 8 <br />5.4.1 Ground Rupture <br /> <br />As noted above, the site is located within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone, for the <br />active Calaveras fault. Based on the findings of our previous fault exploration, recommendations <br />for building setbacks have been provided as shown on Figure 2. Provided that the setbacks <br />recommendations are respected, the potential for fault rupture through the proposed building site <br />is considered low. <br /> <br />5.4.2 Ground Shaking <br /> <br />An earthquake of moderate to high magnitude generated within the San Francisco Bay Region <br />could cause considerable ground shaking at the site, similar to that which has occurred in the <br />past. To mitigate the shaking effects, all structures should be designed using sound engineering <br />judgment and the 2007 California Building Code (CBC) requirements, as a minimum. <br /> <br />Seismic design provisions of current building codes generally prescribe minimum lateral forces, <br />applied statically to the structure, combined with the gravity forces of dead-and-live loads. The <br />code-prescribed lateral forces are generally considered to be substantially smaller than the <br />comparable forces that would be associated with a major earthquake. Therefore, structures <br />should be able to: (1) resist minor earthquakes without damage, (2) resist moderate earthquakes <br />without structural damage but with some nonstructural damage, and (3) resist major earthquakes <br />without collapse but with some structural as well as nonstructural damage. Conformance to the <br />current building code recommendations does not constitute any kind of guarantee that significant <br />structural damage would not occur in the event of a maximum magnitude earthquake; however, <br />it is reasonable to expect that a well-designed and well-constructed structure will not collapse or <br />cause loss of life in a major earthquake (SEAOC, 1996). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.